~~~~~~
When God (including Jesus) provided his brief (but, we now know, amazingly accurate) outline description of His Creation for man to record as Scripture,
Moses may well have been able to admire this marvel of God's Creation:
But, he diden't have a scanning electron microscope so he could marvel at the intricacy of its pollen:
Moses could see the same heavens you see when you look up at at the night sky. But with our modern tools, we can see majestic vistas of God's created Universe that Moses had no idea even existed:
And moses probably never knew that preserved records of long-dead creatures lay in the rocks beneath his feet
But they are all part of God's Creation and are just as valid a testament to His mighty works as is man himself.
All of the above are "pages" from "God's other record of His Creation: His created universe, itself." We call the study of it, "science".
And that revealed "Book" is just as much His as is His Written Word. For, as John 1:3 says,
All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made."
You cannot trust God's written Book without trusting His revealed "Book", for both are His -- and both are absolutely true.
Any man who accepts the truth of either one and denies the other calls God Himself a liar. And any interpretation of one Book that leads to discomfort with or the need to deny the other "Book" is a sure sign that the Deceiver is at work...
(Read John 1:1, and you will understand, why, in Genesis God said, "Let us make man in our image".)
I don't recieve that.. To me the same ones call God a "fool"..
Big difference.. And those that follow "the fool", morons..
Thereby raising themselves up to be "smart"... or "smarter"..
Professing themselves to wise become fools"... as scripture says.. Logic can be reciprocal..
Well I will agree that Moses did not have a *scanning electron microscope*, however if the Heavenly Father had need for Moses to see the intricacy of pollen a scanning electron microscope would not have been required.
There was a whole lot of instruction regarding 'kind after kind' to not think that Moses was given a lesson in nature, however elementary it might have been.
Brings to mind Jeremiah 18.
I also would not agree that Moses was not aware of 'fossils' coming from an age before considering some of the things he penned. The translations we have today do not always give we the modern reader the full design given in the original Hebrew.
I also find that the evidence turned up on this earth does not disagree with what the scripture says.
HOORAY! Thank you so much for pinging me to that post!