So the article is not perfect. But she does indeed go into some rather gruesome detail about using tissues from aborted babies - some apparently conceived for the purpose of killing them and using their tissues - for "medical" purposes. Did you not see that part?
You seem to be picking up on some ambiguity and ignoring the fact that people are using and advocating that which is patently evil and cruel.
Did you not see that part?
Did you not see where I specifically stated that I saw that part?
I don’t know why you need to keep asking me these annoying questions. I said I read the article and I understood it.
I took issue with the writer's inability to distinguish between the gruesome horrific forms of stem cell treatment (yes, I read that part) and the perfectly acceptable forms. As far as I can see, my point was perfectly clear to everybody who read it, except you, and my sentiments were shared by a majority of people on this thread.
And before you ask me again, yes I did read where she described some of the more horrific procedures.