Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Even dead people can't escape AOL
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH ^ | 08/04/2006 | David Sheets

Posted on 08/06/2006 7:53:47 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Maxine Gauthier doesn't own a computer. She doesn't know the first thing about Web browsing or sending e-mail. She's not even sure where to find a computer's "on" button, as she describes it.

Yet for the past nine months, she has been fighting one of the most persistent and some say irritating institutions in cyberspace: AOL, formerly known as America Online.

"An AOL service guy told me to stop complaining and learn to use a computer," she said. "Then he hung up."

Most of AOL's $1 billion in profits continues to come from subscriptions to dial-up service, a market it still dominates.

When Gauthier's father, Melvin Berkowitz, died last summer, he was living in Florida and had one credit card. Its only charges were to AOL. Gauthier's mother, Marion Berkowitz, now 80, and still living in Florida, had her name on the account but never used it.

Gauthier discovered the continuing dial-up service charge as she was settling her father's estate. She first called to cancel the AOL account last November.

With each subsequent call, AOL became more curt with Gauthier. During one exchange, "the guy - I think it was a manager - just told me to 'shut up and listen to what I have to say or don't bother calling.' Then he hung up on me," she said.

Finally, this month, Gauthier was able to cancel her father's credit card. The AOL charges, going back to last summer, were wiped away, and she was reimbursed for both the charges and late fees.

A few days ago, Gauthier obtained a letter from AOL that was sent to her mother in Florida. The letter was addressed to Melvin Berkowitz.

"Dear Mr. Berkowitz," it said. "We hope you'll come back to AOL."

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: aol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: SandwicheGuy

It's a little bizarre, for you to be waxing philosophical at this point. So, you've made a jerk of yourself. Let it go. I know I'm not losing any sleep.


61 posted on 08/06/2006 12:55:27 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
So, you've made a jerk of yourself.

LOL! See, as I said earlier, it is no use trying to discuss anything with an AOL member... Thank so much for proving my point. Now go back to sleep, I know you did the best you could do and it was just precious, bless your heart!

62 posted on 08/06/2006 1:22:57 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SandwicheGuy

You're nothing if not repititious. Have the last word, child.


63 posted on 08/06/2006 1:28:11 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Schwaeky
to be sure I only use it as the portal to the web, because my access is via DSL, but for me its been great...

You know you don't need a "portal" to surf the web, right? So in other words, you use AOL for nothing. Of course it's "great." I do nothing and I'm great at it, if I do say so myself. Now pay me 20$ per month.

64 posted on 08/06/2006 1:40:15 PM PDT by Oschisms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

While it is true that a retailer with a current number "could" continue to charge and bill....only if you haven't put a stop order on that merchant and their business. Another way to "stop" an order, would be to call your credit company and report a lost/stolen card....you get an entirely new number.


65 posted on 08/06/2006 1:49:13 PM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SandwicheGuy

I've had an AOL account for over 13 years....it happens to be the email address most people know me by. I don't use Aol for web browsing, I much prefer Mozilla, but have found that Aol has terrific child security settings. I can set the access for my 12 year old daughter, and ensure no one can send her inappropriate crap. My husband, who although having used a PC for almost 20 years, is not internet savvy, and likes his Aol. We both hate their news content, so eventually we may get rid of the accounts, but I'd dare say there are others out there like our family who've hung on for various reasons.


66 posted on 08/06/2006 1:58:34 PM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Oschisms

when you already have an existing connection, aol only charges 9.99 a month.. i use it for chat and other things too like the news information when I'm not on FR..


67 posted on 08/06/2006 2:18:49 PM PDT by Schwaeky (Welcome to America--Now speak English or LEAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Katya
I much prefer Mozilla, but have found that Aol has terrific child security settings

Thank you for your reasoned post. What you say is true and is often used as a rationale by AOL users. And as I have said, the exeption proves the rule.

I would, however, caution you to not relay on the child-friendly features. There is no better internet guardian than an involved parent. Kids are kids and they WILL work-around locks, bars, passwords and all other security measurs set up by parents and teachers. Technology changes every month and what was secure this month is an exploit next month. You will probably have better luck teaching your child how to browse and email safely rather than relying on the someone else's idea of security.

And FYI, you would not believe how manny perverts use AOL and I hope you guard yourself and your family against them. After all, it is your responsility, not AOL's. There have been some really tragic stories of girls who have been left alone on AOL with all its child-friendly features.

68 posted on 08/06/2006 2:21:30 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN

Cain't be satellite. They point downward.


69 posted on 08/07/2006 9:03:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
I've used AOL exclusively for my Internet service since 1997, and I've never had cause for a serious complaint.

If you've always ridden a bicycle with training wheels, of course you're happy with it.
70 posted on 08/08/2006 7:38:52 AM PDT by Xenalyte (who is having the best day ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson