[oh8eleven]

I've followed the studies and have been in conversation with a couple of retinal specialists.
You made the claim the results were less than honest - now back it up with the data, not anecdotal information.

One does not need to be a eye doctor, or a medical professional of any type, to have big red flags go up over a 95% success rate.
Jonas Salk would be interested to know that.

[EyeGuy]

"You made the claim the results were less than honest - now back it up with the data, not anecdotal information."

I absolutely did NOT. I said the results were painted IN THIS ARTICLE with much too broad a brush. I don't respond to orders, look it up yourself. You will indeed see that treatment "success" and "success group" are much more rigidly defined than the article implies.

"Jonas Salk would be interested to know that."

A ridiculous statement, comparing PCN's broad, uneven effectiveness against SOME forms of bacteria, versus this irresponsibly open-ended statement regarding what is in actuality a specific neuro-destructive condition at a specific stage in the disease process:

"About 95 percent of patients regain their sight after treatment".