Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
I bet that the questioning, especially from Russert, will show a bias for Lieberman.

The questioning struck me as very hostile to Lieberman.  Only a few questions about Lamont for Jim Dean and one of those was about this not being a case of  voting for Lamont but against Lieberman.

And lil Timmah was in full hunch mode for his attempted smackdown of Rice.  She was totally unruffled.

206 posted on 08/06/2006 8:14:19 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok

Still watching and listening.


209 posted on 08/06/2006 8:15:20 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok

Russert is obviously very anti-Lieberman.

Plus, they have the nerve to declare Jim Dean's position as "Supporter, Lamont for Senate".

UPDATE: Meet the Press waited until the debate was almost over to label Jim Dean as "Head, Democracy for America".

Sick, twisted, deceptive Democrats.


212 posted on 08/06/2006 8:19:11 AM PDT by itslex71 (southern by birth, republican by the grace of my dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson