To: Crazieman
PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE WAS IMPROPERLY USED ON THIS IMAGE. I guess next time they'll use it properly and not get caught.
To: Right_in_Virginia
PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE WAS IMPROPERLY USED ON THIS IMAGE. I guess next time they'll use it properly and not get caught.
Agree. What they meant by 'improperly used' is the photographer was not 'professional enough' that it get caught. The 'properly used of editing software' means their fake pics would never get caught.
The sad part is that the photographer perhaps simply gets a 'warning' (not to be that unprofessional next time), and that's it.
39 posted on
08/06/2006 4:57:36 AM PDT by
paudio
(Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
To: Right_in_Virginia
94 posted on
08/06/2006 5:21:25 AM PDT by
Wings-n-Wind
(All of the answers remain available; Wisdom is gained by asking the right questions!)
To: Right_in_Virginia
PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE WAS IMPROPERLY USED ON THIS IMAGE. "I guess next time they'll use it properly and not get caught."
Bingo! How many others have slipped through? How many scenes were manipulated?
96 posted on
08/06/2006 5:21:59 AM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: Right_in_Virginia
PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE WAS
IMPROPERLY INCOMPETENTLYINCOMPETENTLYINCOMPETENTLY USED ON THIS IMAGE.
fixed it.
249 posted on
08/06/2006 7:23:00 AM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: Right_in_Virginia
I guess next time they'll use it properly and not get caught.They think...
256 posted on
08/06/2006 7:29:46 AM PDT by
null and void
(Bipartisanship: when the Stupid Party & the Evil Party agree on something that is both stupid & evil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson