Just a thought here.
Because the photoshop job was so bad, maybe it's bad on purpose, done by someone that wants to send a message that we need to look at other photos.
I'm only saying this because that is exactly what is happening.
[Just a thought here.
Because the photoshop job was so bad, maybe it's bad on purpose, done by someone that wants to send a message that we need to look at other photos.
I'm only saying this because that is exactly what is happening.]
I see your point. It's hard to understand that level of stupidity by a "professional" photographer. I guess that may be the essential question, was it done out of stupidity and agenda-driven or was it done purposefully to make people aware of the deception that is possible? Who, in fact, doctored the photo before it was published?Perhaps more investigation of the photgrapher and his bio and "associations" is in order.