Here is the fake:
The correction is in a yahoo slide show here: "accurate foto"
Although, best I can tell, yahoo is also still happily showing the fake here: 9:03am est
Reuters has NO credibility.
How do we know that the "accurate" one is not just a prior version of the original doctored photo? Say their were 10 evolutions of the original photo leading to the one that was published and that the so called "accurate" one is one of the 9 evolutions?
The problem this poses is that without a detailed explanation of what happened, all photo;s are now suspect.