Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StJacques

Argghhh... I thought maybe the Tribunal was humoring AMLO.

Does it sound like the Court will allow the subjective method Al Gore favored, i.e. "nobody can really tell who this chad was for, but I think it was for me"?


7 posted on 08/05/2006 12:29:29 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: mjolnir

The ballots are hand-marked with an "X" using a colored pen. If more than one candidate is marked, the ballot is null -- no exceptions, because the voter has the right to request a new ballot if they marked improperly in which case their original one will be destroyed in the presence of the precinct officials before the new ballot is issued. Either the ballot has one "X" only or it is not counted. And if the ballot is not marked at all, then it is not counted either. No hanging chads this time around.


9 posted on 08/05/2006 1:01:04 PM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson