Skip to comments.
Officials: U.S., France reach Mideast resolution (US Appeasement?)
Yahoo/AP ^
| 8/5/2006
| AP
Posted on 08/05/2006 8:00:16 AM PDT by tobyhill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: tobyhill
because the Hezbos will violate the terms making the US look like village idiots...No, the "world community" that has been weeping for Hezbollah will look like Village Idiots. We will be proven right in our support for Israel.
21
posted on
08/05/2006 8:18:30 AM PDT
by
inkling
To: Mike Darancette
We'll defend N.Israel to the last Frenchman -- That's a good thing.Exactly. By working directly with the French, it is now in France's interest to keep the peace with their own soldiers.
22
posted on
08/05/2006 8:20:24 AM PDT
by
inkling
To: NorCalRepub
I hope you're right but when have we ever got the credit for trying? When things fall apart it's always our fault regardless who violated the terms that we set up.
23
posted on
08/05/2006 8:21:55 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: tobyhill
We'll call it the world's shortest sanctioned ceasefire. "The Six-Day Ceasefire?"
24
posted on
08/05/2006 8:23:17 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(will you still be all gung ho about euthenasia when your kids want to do it to you?)
To: tobyhill
however this turns out - israel is on board, they have been in the loop all along, the degree to which they wanted to go in on the ground - was their decision. the US gave them at much room as they wanted.
if this is the endgame - israel wants it.
To: tobyhill
Great news. Now all US and France has to do is convince terrorists to give up their 72 virgins.
26
posted on
08/05/2006 8:24:16 AM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(Could mecca be Satan's' throne?)
To: JasonC
"Since Hezbollah will attack Israel, as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, this is meaningless and dead on arrival."
Yup.
Exactly how do they propose to get Hizbullah to stop firing rockets again? Or Iran and Syria to stop aupplying these vermin with rockets?
Luckily the Isrealis are not so naive:
"Israeli envoy to U.S.: No cease-fire until soldiers released
To be acceptable to Israel, he said a final UN resolution on ending hostilities would have to include freedom for the soldiers, who could be passed on by Hezbollah to the Lebanese government for release.
Ayalon said Israel was pressing for implementation of UN Resolution 1559, which includes the disarming of Hezbollah and the deployment of the Lebanese Army into southern Lebanon.
In addition, he said there needed to be safeguards included in the resolution to prevent Hezbollah's main backers, Syria and Iran, from shipping arms to militias fighting Israel in southern Lebanon. "
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1678017/posts
27
posted on
08/05/2006 8:24:37 AM PDT
by
Jameison
To: tobyhill
They won't hand them over after the lose their base, either. Give them up, they are gone.
28
posted on
08/05/2006 8:24:39 AM PDT
by
JasonC
To: Jameison
Yeah, there are wishes and there are horses. Israel won't get any of this stuff. Ever. They also don't have to stop.
29
posted on
08/05/2006 8:25:54 AM PDT
by
JasonC
To: takenoprisoner
We won't talk to the Hezbos so their excuse will be that they won't ceasefire until we talk directly to them and then the UN will get on our case about not talking to them. It's the terrorist/UN game they like to play.
30
posted on
08/05/2006 8:28:36 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: tobyhill
Any cease fire that just locks the status quo in place is a defeat for Israel and the USA.
To: JasonC
"They also don't have to stop"
Exactly.
32
posted on
08/05/2006 8:32:10 AM PDT
by
Jameison
To: inkling
According to FNC's website:
"It does not say immediate cessation of violence," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the draft had not yet been made public.
That appeared to be a major victory for the U.S. and Israel. France and many other nations had demanded an immediate halt to the fighting without conditions as a way to push the region back toward stability.
33
posted on
08/05/2006 8:32:26 AM PDT
by
kesg
To: tobyhill
This "treaty" or whatever you want to call it is being brokered by two outside parties. Traditionally, each representative would be acting as the trusted friend of one of the combatants. The unspeakable truth is that here France officially gives notice to the world that it is Hezbollah's agent.
34
posted on
08/05/2006 8:37:09 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jiggyboy
Just heard n MSNBC the Hezbos just rejected the proposal before it was proposed.
35
posted on
08/05/2006 8:41:14 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: inkling
The Israelis won't agree to this text if it ties their hands too much.Never underestimate Olmert's ability to do the wrong thing for Israel. Many of his countrymen now openly call him a traitor.
36
posted on
08/05/2006 8:46:34 AM PDT
by
Founding Father
(You cannot wage a war in a politically correct manner and win.)
To: Founding Father
I wish Israel would level a large city in Lebanon like Tyre so that way every time the camel jockeys claim they won Israel can distribute the pictures proving otherwise. In war there is one way to determine a winner, who kills the most and who destroys the most.
37
posted on
08/05/2006 8:51:12 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: NorCalRepub
You are correct in that we will get credit, because at least we tried. And we will get the credit because, I hate to say this, we agreed with the French and therefore we are not pushing for the resolution alone.
Hezbol will mess up and Israel will respond. Also, one key point in the article:
But it does not call for an "immediate cessation of violence," those officials said...
To: tobyhill
"....would allow Israel the right to launch strikes if Hezbollah attacks it."
That sounds like a dealbreaker.
39
posted on
08/05/2006 8:52:59 AM PDT
by
angkor
To: angkor
Worlds shortest ceasefire.
40
posted on
08/05/2006 8:54:23 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson