Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanMade1776
"The problem with this can be illustrated by recourse to my pro wrestling analogy. The whole of pro wrestling is dominated by quick, decisive moves. You pick up someone and body slam them. You apply a sleeper hold. Every punch is a haymaker, every kick is apocalyptic, every move is dynamic.

Real wrestling is the opposite. You can be deadlocked for minutes at a time. Even matches between experts can, to the untrained eye, be quite unremarkable. There are very few decisive moves in the pro wrestling sense. Victory is far more subtle."


Next election cycle...new liberal busswords instead of "Red Meat" introduced simultaneously on multiple different mainstream liberal media outlets when a conservative mentions anything regarding pro-life or real tax cuts, the new ones: "fake wrestling", "pro wrestling" or "body slaming"


While are a good observations about the difference between pro-style wrestling and real-wrestling, they provide more insight into the mind of liberals.


Good writing and speaking is concise:

Being concise doesn't mean that one hasn't thought deeply about issues.

from Strunk and White's "The Elements of Style":

http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk5.html#13

Omit needless words.
"Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell."


Liberals like to ramble on and on without making a point.
Liberals arguments are quite unremarkable even to the trained eye. If liberals would make strong arguments for what they actually believed in, nobody would vote for them.
150 posted on 08/07/2006 7:40:44 AM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomProtector

Liberals like to ramble on and on without making a point.
Liberals arguments are quite unremarkable even to the trained eye. If liberals would make strong arguments for what they actually believed in, nobody would vote for them.

Or if they do make a "point" it is rarely something that is remotely achievable hence testable.


151 posted on 08/09/2006 5:41:28 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (God Bless Taxpayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson