1. Who "decided" that bones they found must be a "sister species" to man? Someone who did not believe in the value of man as created in God's image, or they would not try to devalue man and upgrade the Neanderthal by association.
And it is a feeble attempt to devalue GOD: if Neanderthal are our "sisters", and we are in the image of God, then God is like a Ne_____. No, I can't even write it.
2. There IS no "direct evolutionary line" with man! Man did not evolve! It does NOT exist as you claim.
There is no evidence FOR man evolving from one species to another, from a tiny little amoeba or whatever into into into into into into poof! Man! Nope, NO evidence.
3. The godless liberal worldview would elevate the monkeys as you have, thinking some sap will say "ohhh they're "primates" ohhh so are we, oh I see." Again fallacy by association, and purposed deception.
4. If you think TToE is not "imposed" upon our schools, you are living in the dark ages.
5. "See #2, above," you said.
Another troll ploy, to refer to a post that has nothing to do with the subject, as if giving a reference, hoping the person won't do the research and check. ZOT!
6. Your next troll ploy is typical, telling me to no longer speak here unless I agree with your trying to indoctrinate other readers with lies
7. Perhaps your knowledge would be deeper if you did not think a "quick Google search" is where knowledge lies. Instead, God Himself says, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge".
The godless refuse that rightful reverence, and hack by hack try to demean the value of man who is created in God's image.
Under the guise of scholarship lies continue to get advanced. Satan masquerades as an angel of light, but he spews lies.
1. Who "decided" that bones they found must be a "sister species" to man? Someone who did not believe in the value of man as created in God's image, or they would not try to devalue man and upgrade the Neanderthal by association.
Researchers studying the morphology of Neanderthal remains and recovered Neanderthal DNA. You'd be surprised at the huge amount of evidence available.
And it is a feeble attempt to devalue GOD: if Neanderthal are our "sisters", and we are in the image of God, then God is like a Ne_____. No, I can't even write it.
So, which person looks like God? Does God have boobs? A penis? Is He blonde, brunette, red-headed? Is He an ectomorph or a mesomorph? Is He white, brown, black, red or yellow? Just what does "made in the image of God" mean?
2. There IS no "direct evolutionary line" with man! Man did not evolve! It does NOT exist as you claim.
There is no evidence FOR man evolving from one species to another, from a tiny little amoeba or whatever into into into into into into poof! Man! Nope, NO evidence.
Man did evolve. Your inability to accept this does not nullify this fact. As for evidence, there are literally hundreds, if not thousands of remains of at least a dozen Australopithecine and Homo species stretching back more than 3 million years spanning the spectrum from nearly ape-like to modern man.
3. The godless liberal worldview would elevate the monkeys as you have, thinking some sap will say "ohhh they're "primates" ohhh so are we, oh I see." Again fallacy by association, and purposed deception.
Monkeys are monkeys; man is man. Just because we are more or less related does not change this fact. We are (very) distantly related to cows, but that doesn't stop me from eating a hamburger on occasion.
4. If you think TToE is not "imposed" upon our schools, you are living in the dark ages.
The Theory of Evolution is the current state of the art in science. It is the schools' duty to teach science in science classes.
5. "See #2, above," you said.
Another troll ploy, to refer to a post that has nothing to do with the subject, as if giving a reference, hoping the person won't do the research and check. ZOT!
The #2 I referred to was the second point in my post.
6. Your next troll ploy is typical, telling me to no longer speak here unless I agree with your trying to indoctrinate other readers with lies
No. I said educate yourself so that, if you still disagree with evolution at least you wouldn't come across as pig-ignorant when addressing your gripes. There are actually a couple (read: "exactly two") creationists on these threads who've made some effort to educate themselves when it comes to evolution. They're still wrong, but they do have some idea of what they are talking about. You don't.
7. Perhaps your knowledge would be deeper if you did not think a "quick Google search" is where knowledge lies. Instead, God Himself says, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge".
No, study is the beginning of knowledge. Fear of the Lord has a tendency to keep people from actually learning anything for fear of enraging God. A quick Google search wasn't proposed to make you an expert. It was proposed to get you to see what the state of the art is on this subject so that you could phrase your objections from a position of knowledge, rather than ignorance.
The godless refuse that rightful reverence, and hack by hack try to demean the value of man who is created in God's image.
If God is the omnipotent and omniscient being He is said to be, nothing mere mortals could ever do would offend Him.
Under the guise of scholarship lies continue to get advanced. Satan masquerades as an angel of light, but he spews lies.
Nope. And the fact that you think the study and understanding of the universe is some sort of Satanic plot scares the beejabbers out of me. It's basically the same attitude espoused by the fundamentalist Islamofascists in their railings against the West.