Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl

This is so simple. All they have to do is, a)find out who wants the dams knocked down, where ever they are; b)determine the cost which should include possible flood damage and crop loss costs; c)shut off the electricity to the supporters of the dam demolition; d)divide A into B which would pay for this foolishment. This can work as the fools that are against the dams would have a lot of free $$ now that they wouldn`t have an electric bill.


5 posted on 08/03/2006 10:41:11 AM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: bybybill
It seems to me that Pacificorp was looking for a payout from day one. Why else negotiate a 50-year license for a dam you have no intention of operating?
"We are not opposed to dam removal or other settlement opportunities as long as our customers are not harmed and our property rights are respected."

The company said the statement reflected its position all along in talks concerning a new 50-year license to operate the dams.


6 posted on 08/03/2006 10:51:35 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson