Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/03/2006 9:06:04 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: conservativecorner

STOP PRINTING FIAT "MONEY!"
*******
(I wrote this a number of years ago when things were NOT going well with the economy. Trust me: They WILL get ugly once again as man -- or certain men -- cannot resist playing God. We continue to violate the universal, immutable laws of economics at our great peril.)

Despite the apparent economic strength of the American economy, history proves that EVERY house of cards eventually comes down. And the higher the card house, the harder the fall when it finally comes. And when it does, the more freedoms we will voluntarily surrender to "restore order." It was the Founders' concern about this historically valid problem which prompted their attempt -- now ignored -- to keep American "money" sound and honest.) Dick Bachert 1998

* * * * * * * *


The Forgotten History of Money
This is the fascinating story of the efforts by certain of the Founding Fathers to prevent the economic distress we find all about us today. It is also a sad story on the basis that modern, "sophisticated" Americans have abandoned the corrective institutional mechanism that remains in place to this day. As you read it, think about a world with many fewer S&L, banking and political scandals and economic problems now considered the norm.

"Blood running in the streets. Mobs of rioters and demonstrators threatening banks and legislatures. Looting of shop and home. Strikes and unemployment. Trade and distribution paralyzed. Shortages of food. Bankruptcies everywhere. Court dockets overloaded. Kidnappings for heavy ransom. Sexual perversion, drunkenness, lawlessness rampant. The wheels of government are clogged, and we are descending into the vale of confusion and darkness. No day was ever more clouded than the present. We are fast verging on anarchy and confusion. (George Washington in a 1786 letter to James Madison, describing the effects of fiat paper money inflation then ravaging America in the pre Constitutional period.)

"The annihilation (of the paper money) was so complete that barber shops were papered in jest with the bills; and sailors, on returning from cruises, being paid off in bundles of this worthless money, had suits made of it, and with characteristic lightheartedness, turned their loss into frolic by parading through the streets in decayed finery which in its better days had passed for thousands of dollars." (Contemporary writer, Breck, 1786)

"Paper money polluted the equity of our laws, turned them into engines of oppression, corrupted the justice of our public administration, destroyed the fortunes of thousands who had confidence in it, enervated the trade and husbandry, and the manufactures of our country, and went far to destroy the morality of out people." (Peletiah Webster, 1786)

At the drafting of the U.S.Constitution, there were many "Friends of Paper Money" present. On August 16, 1787, when the discussion arose on Article 1, Section 8, the proposed wording was this: "The Legislature of the United States shall have the power to...coin money...and emit bills of credit of the United States."

A hot argument ensued on the power to emit bills of credit, which is another way of saying "printing paper money".

Here are the actual words James Madison wrote describing the debate in his diary: "Mr.G.Morris moved to strike out *and emit bills of credit.* If the United States had credit, such bills would be unnecessary; if they had not, unjust and useless.

MADISON: Will it not be sufficient to prohibit the making them a tender? This will remove the temptation to emit them with unjust views. And promissory notes in that shape may in some emergencies be best.
MORRIS: Striking out the words will leave room still for notes of a responsible minister which will do the good without the mischief. The monied interest will oppose the plan of the Government, if paper emissions be not prohibited.
COL.MASON: Though he had a mortal hatred to paper money, yet as he could not foresee all emergencies, we was unwilling to tie the hands of the Legislature [Legislature = Congress].
MR.MERCER:(A friend to paper money) It was impolitic...to excite the opposition of all those who were friends to paper money.
MR. ELSEWORTH thought this was a favorable moment to shut and bar the door against paper money. The mischiefs of the various experiments which had been made, were now fresh in the public mind and had excited the disgust of all the respectable part of America. By withholding the power from the new Government, more friends of influence would be gained to it than by almost anything else...Give the Government credit, and other will offer. The power may do harm, never good.
MR.WILSON: It will have a most salutary influence on the credit of the United States to remove the possibility of paper money. This expedient can never succeed whilst its mischiefs are remembered, and as long as it can be resorted to, it will be a bar to other resources.
MR.READ thought the words, if not struck out, would be as alarming as the mark of the Beast in Revelation.
MR.LANGDON had rather reject the whole plan than retain the three words *and emit bills*".

The motion for striking out carried.

Historian George Bancroft later wrote: "James Madison left his testimony that *the pretext for a paper currency, and particularly for making the bills a tender, either for public or private debts, was cut
off.* This is the interpretation of the clause, made at the time of its adoption by all the statesmen of that age, not open to dispute because too clear for argument, and never disputed so long as any one man who took part in framing the constitution remained alive."

ROGER SHERMAN(1721 1793)should be a name familiar to every American. As familiar as Washington, Madison, Jefferson and Adams. He is the only man to have signed all 4 documents surrounding the formation of the United States of America: The Continental Association of 1772, The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation and The United States Constitution. He was a Judge of the Superior Court in New Haven, Connecticut, serving that office with distinction from 1766 until 1788. He served as Treasurer of Yale University from 1765 to 1776. He was renouned for his high intelligence and unswerving honesty and was described by John Adams "as honest as an angel and as
firm in the cause of American independence as Mount Atlas." He served in the U.S.Senate from 1791 until his death in 1793.

Why is Roger Sherman*s name unfamiliar? HE WAS AN ENEMY OF PAPER MONEY!! In 1751, Roger Sherman and his brother William sued James Battle for paying a debt to their shop in New Milford, Connecticut, in depreciating paper currency. Over a period of 15 months, Battle had charged "divers wares and merchandizes" amounting to 129 pounds of what
Sherman assumed were pounds of Connecticut "Old Tenor", a stable currency whose value were well preserved by taxation taking it out of circulation. But Battle assumed the debt was denominated in pounds of ever depreciating Rhode Island currency, tendered in same, and the Shermans took a beating in the payment and sued for recovery of loss by depreciation. The Shermans lost when Battle argued that he was merely following the accepted custom of the day. In 1752, Sherman wrote his book "A Caveat Against Injustice or An Inquiry into the Evils of a Fluctuating Medium of Exchange" indicting UNBACKED PAPER MONEY.

It was this experience that Sherman brought to the Constitutional Convention and prompted him to rise on August 28,1787 and propose new, more restrictive wording to Article 1,Section 10. The standing version under consideration was worded this way: "No state shall coin money; nor grant letters of marque and reprisal; nor enter into any Treaty, alliance, or confederation; nor grant any title of Nobility." (From Madison’s Notes of the Convention) "Judge Sherman and Mr. Wilson moved to insert the words *coin money* the words *nor emit bills of credit, nor make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts* making these prohibitions absolute, instead of making the measures allowable with the consent of the Legislature of the U.S. Mr. Sherman thought this a FAVORABLE CRISIS FOR CRUSHING PAPER MONEY. If the consent of the Legislature could authorize emissions of it, the friends of paper money would make every exertion to get into the Legislature in order to license it." Mr. Sherman*s and Mr. Wilson*s motion was quickly agreed to and became the supreme law of the land.

Some additional quotations to ponder:

"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise not from defects in the constitution or confederation, nor from a want of honor or virtue so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation" (John Adams in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, 1787)

"I deny the power of the general government to making paper money, or anything else, a legal tender." (Thomas Jefferson)

"You have been doubtless been informed, from time to time, of the happy progress of our affairs. The principal difficulties seem in great measure to have been surmounted. Our revenues have been considerably
more productive than it was imagined they would be. I mention this to show the spirit of enterprise that prevails." (George Washington in a letter to the Marquis de LaFayette, June 3, 1790 AFTER the United States Constitution prohibited unbacked paper money at Article 1, Section 10)

"Since the federal constitution has removed all danger of our having a paper tender, our trade is advanced fifty percent. Our monied people can trust their cash abroad, and have brought their coin into circulation." (December 16, 1789 edition of The Pennsylvania
Gazette)

"Our country, my dear sir, is fast progressing in its political importance and social happiness." (George Washington in a letter to the Marquis de LaFayette, March 19, 1791)

"The United States enjoys a sense of prosperity and tranquility under the new government that could hardly have been hoped for." (George Washington in a letter to Catherine Macaulay Graham, July 19,1791)

"Tranquility reigns among the people with that disposition towards the general government which is likely to preserve it. Our public credit stands on that high ground which three years ago would have been
considered as a species of madness to have foretold." (George Washington in a letter to David Humphreys, July 20, 1791)

"It is apparent from the whole context of the Constitution as well as the times which gave birth to it, that it was the purpose of the Convention to establish a currency consisting of the precious metals.
These were adopted by a permanent rule excluding the use of a perishable medium of exchange, such as certain agricultural commodities recognized by the statutes of some States as tender for debts, or the still more pernicious expedient of PAPER CURRENCY." (Andrew Jackson, 8th Annual Message to Congress, December 5, 1836)

DESPITE WHAT YOU WERE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL, THE HISTORICAL RECORD IS CRYSTAL CLEAR: AMERICA WAS TO HAVE BEEN SPARED THE DESTRUCTIVE EFFECTS OF AN UNBACKED PAPER MONEY SYSTEM. MOST OF THE PROBLEMS WE FACE TODAY CAN BE TRACED TO WHAT ANDREW JACKSON CALLED "THE PERNICIOUS EXPEDIENT OF PAPER MONEY".

HISTORY TEACHES THAT AN "ARTIFICIAL" MONEY CREATES AN "ARTIFICIAL" WORLD WHERE THE PRICE FOR SOME ITEM...EVEN OUR MOST POPULAR WELFARE "PROGRAM"...CAN BE DEFERRED TO FUTURE GENERATIONS (OUR $11 TRILLION
NATIONAL DEBT) OR PAID WITH A "MONEY" CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR WHICH ROBS THE VALUE FROM THE MONEY WE MIGHT BE UNFORTUNATE ENOUGH TO HAVE IN OUR POCKETS AT THAT MOMENT (INFLATION). AND ONE THING YOU MUST REMEMBER ABOUT INFLATION IS THAT IT IS NOT AN "EQUAL OPPORTUNITY" DESTROYER: THOSE FIRST IN LINE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON THE NEW MONEY ROLLING OFF THE PRESSES (THE MODERN FRIENDS OF PAPER MONEY) HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEND IT BEFORE IT LOSES ITS VALUE. THE LITTLE PEOPLE (THAT’S US, FOLKS!) FARTHEST DOWN THE LINE ARE THE ONES WHO FEEL THE FULLEST EFFECTS OF THIS DESTRUCTIVE PROCESS.
filename:$history

Dick Bachert


2 posted on 08/03/2006 9:08:06 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Abnsurd Nonsense. The thing that busts the budget is Medicare and Social Security. And they are only going to get worse as the Baby Boomers retire. All the ranting and raving about "Fiscal Reporting" and "Discresionary Spending" is to dick around on the edges and avoid the REAL problem.


3 posted on 08/03/2006 9:09:56 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
Total fiscal exposures: $46.4 trillion.

Total household net worth: $51.1 trillion.

If "total fiscal exposures" includes Social Security and Medicare, it is dishonest to compare that to household net worth.

4 posted on 08/03/2006 9:11:17 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
There are only two ways out of the fiscal mess that is coming:

1. Reign in spending and reduce government. And that ain't going to happen because it would actually make the politicians make hard decisions and act responsible (how are they going to buy votes?).

2. Inflate the way out of this. The government may have promised you $2000 a month in Social Security and Medicare - but if that only buys a lunch it will mean nothing. And the politicians will have to take no hard decisions but will have "solved" this issue.

So - invest in hard assets (gold, real estate, Swiss franc, etc.) that go up with inflation. Certain stocks will do well.

Timing is key (housing bubble that is deflating right now)

Comments?

7 posted on 08/03/2006 9:14:38 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

It sure is a good thing the democrats are no longer in control of the Legislative and Executive branches, else we would really be in truouble, Right?


8 posted on 08/03/2006 9:15:29 AM PDT by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
the Defense Department "is the only agency in the federal government that cannot adequately account for its assets and its expenditures - and cannot withstand an outside financial statement audit."

Rubbish. No big government agency could withstand the kind of auditing they routinely inflict on private business.

Review and revise tax policy and enforcement programs - including tax expenditures.

For him even to use such a term is proof that he is a statist and socialist. "Tax expenditures" is liberal-speak for what ordinary sensible Americans would call "tax cuts". The assumption is that the government lays claim to 100% of what you produce, and anything they let you keep is an "expenditure."

I agree with his alarmism about deficit spending, but my solution to that problem would not sit well with the statist government-worshipers and dependent teat-suckers.

-ccm

9 posted on 08/03/2006 9:15:30 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
This guy is correct, but ultimately doomed to be ignored.

No one wants to admit or confront the problem, that would be to hard. Meanwhile enjoy the party, for the bill will come tomorrow.
12 posted on 08/03/2006 9:18:31 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
I wonder why this article leaves out the quote about baby boomers being the first generation in America to leave America in worst shape than when they inherited it?

For some reason, that thread was pulled, or one of them was.

22 posted on 08/03/2006 9:40:34 AM PDT by yellowdoghunter (Vote out the RINO's; volunteer to help get Conservative Republicans elected!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

pinging for later


24 posted on 08/03/2006 9:54:20 AM PDT by GOP_Thug_Mom (libera nos a malo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

I noticed he didn't get into the issue of the fedgov's "unfunded liabilities" that surpass $50 Tillion and counting........guess he didn't want to depress us too much.


25 posted on 08/03/2006 9:56:04 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Bump for later.


32 posted on 08/03/2006 10:19:07 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner; All

....and no one knows how much the 20 ton invisible stealth elephant wearing blue tennis shoes in the tea room costs.....................the black budget is?


39 posted on 08/03/2006 8:18:37 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
first, change all govt ...local, state, federal...pension systems to simple 401K's ....no more obscene public pensions for anyone....president on down to the local teachers or postmen....

SS should be indexed......you get 100% of what you paid in but after that, its all taxed as ordinary income AND if you are one of the famous double and triple dippers, OR if you have a fat private pension, then your SS checks will be decreased in some form......

no entity can continue doing good work if it has promised a bulk of its budget to retirees.....roads can't be built, zoos can't be sustained, schools can't keep up with modern technology, and the Armed forces can't be the modern, superior force we need if a large portion of their budget goes to retired military.....IMO of course....(I have a dtr who gets Medicaid and a hubby who will get a Guard pension eventually so cutbacks would hit us at home too....but I feel it has to be done)

43 posted on 08/03/2006 9:45:18 PM PDT by cherry (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
This following Bible passage perfectly describes our own current rulers and outlook...

Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah, "Hear the word of the LORD : The time will surely come when everything in your palace, and all that your fathers have stored up until this day, will be carried off to Babylon. Nothing will be left, says the LORD.

And some of your descendants, your own flesh and blood, that will be born to you, will be taken away, and they will become eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon."

"The word of the LORD you have spoken is good," Hezekiah replied. For he thought, "Will there not be peace and security in my lifetime?"... Isaiah 20:16-19

This prophecy was fulfilled completely. Hezekiah was more concerned about his own personal peace and security than the looming destruction of his nation and descendants.

The parallels to today are striking!

53 posted on 08/04/2006 8:20:12 AM PDT by Gritty (Bush should appoint to his cabinet a Secretary of Squander - Norman Liebmann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

>>>The Comptroller General of the United States warns the nation will go broke within a generation - unless it takes radical steps now to rein in out-of-control federal spending.

I'm sure glad Bush is a tight-fisted conservative!

It appears that it's not just spending but "committments" of future moo-lah, like MediCare, etc. So, the problem is not just increasing the money supply (printing dollars), and not just borrowing money instead of printing it. It's all three issues: government spending (shows up in printing money and borrowing money) and future entitlements.

As Plato suggested: democracy -> anarchy -> dictatorship -> autocracy -> oligarchy -> republican form of government -> democracy. We're on the curve!


54 posted on 08/04/2006 8:34:39 AM PDT by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
"The United States may be the only superpower, but compared to most other OECD countries [countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development] on selected key economic, social, and environmental indicators, on average, the U.S. ranks 16 out of 28," announces Walker to an accompanying slide.

I wonder which countries rank, on average, 1 through 15.

55 posted on 08/04/2006 9:09:55 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
Walker is an Clinton appointee and an old time party hack.  He's been at loggerheads with the Republicans from the beginning.  A few years ago the NYT announced that Walker was trying to suing the White House over "secrecy".

There are valid sources on fiscal responsibility; example  Investor's Business Daily: The Deficit's Demise?.   Walker's article is the same old sameold --one lie after another.   Next he'll probably be writing for Hezbollah's press office.

62 posted on 08/05/2006 8:50:36 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson