You've also agreed with & cited court opinions on the 'collective right' position many times over the years.
I've cited those opinions, yes. What, truth hurts? Shooting the messenger helps the pain?
There you go, admitting you've cited court opinions on the 'collective right', -- obviously because they agreed with ~your~ opinions on the 'collective right'.
Attempting to say you are only the "messenger", are typical of your methods to weasel out.
You just can't admit that you will take most any position to 'win' an argument, can you?
Not the point.
You just made it a 'point', above. How droll and pitiful can you get paulsen?
I just want you to stop lying to people by telling them that the second amendment protects their individual RKBA.
Only to you, and a very few demented others, is that a "lie".
It gives them a false sense of security and demotivates them from securing the protection of these rights at the state level.
You advocate that States have the power to prohibit guns, -- or most any thing else, -- every day on this forum, -- through 'majority rule'.
How can anyone "secure rights" if they are subject to a 'democratic vote'?
Why bother when tpaine says RKBA is already protected by the second amendment? -- You're Sarah Brady's best ally.
[Just a few days ago I caught paulsen virtually spouting the Brady line verbatim. It scored, as we see.]
I noticed that.