Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Ambassador: Civil war in Iraq 'most likely'
BBC News ^ | August 3, 2006

Posted on 08/03/2006 12:29:53 AM PDT by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2006 12:29:55 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Is this really the worst thing that could happen in Iraq? Would it be a long term thing or a quick cleansing of certain elements in the society that need doing away with?
2 posted on 08/03/2006 12:32:04 AM PDT by msnimje (Uni-FAIL - UN peace keeping force in Lebanon has lived up to its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

solution = take out Iran


3 posted on 08/03/2006 12:32:19 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

It's more likely that Iran to be attacked than Iraq coming to a civil war.


4 posted on 08/03/2006 12:38:44 AM PDT by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

in a confidential memo to ministers obtained by the BBC.

I am so sick of this treacherous crap.

5 posted on 08/03/2006 12:43:59 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Michael Moore said there needed to be a clear strategy for Iraq, including the engagement of neighbouring countries such as Iran, Syria and Turkey.

Lucky for THIS Michael Moore he is apparently, like his fellow-named American, a liberal. Imagine all the jokes if he was a conservative.

6 posted on 08/03/2006 12:54:41 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Abortion: One Dead, One Wounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Is this really the worst thing that could happen in Iraq?




Yes, the blood letting would kill hundreds of thousands and the US public would force the government to bring the troops home rather then be in the middle of a civil war. At which time Iran, Syria, and Turkey move in an divide up Iraq.

A civil war means the end of Iraq.


7 posted on 08/03/2006 12:58:03 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969; All

Hope this civil war doesn't happen of course but I bet BBC and all the rest of MSM/radical left are getting excited - looks like they've been hoping for this for a least a year now.


8 posted on 08/03/2006 1:02:37 AM PDT by Mac1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mac1

Most international analysts are right now predicting a civil war in Iraq. What I think they don't seem to understand is the Iraqi militia leaders like Sadr, Hakim, and others are cowards and will always hedge their bets. They don't want to go all in and risk losing everything so they will continue playing this sick game that gets Iraqis killed, but stops short of a civil war.

Sadr and company are cowards who don't have the nads to put their throats on the line and these scum putting their throats on the line would be a main requirement for a civil war.


9 posted on 08/03/2006 1:10:05 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Interesting take on this.


10 posted on 08/03/2006 1:12:39 AM PDT by Mac1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Yes, the blood letting would kill hundreds of thousands...

How could you possibly know that?
11 posted on 08/03/2006 1:22:24 AM PDT by msnimje (Uni-FAIL - UN peace keeping force in Lebanon has lived up to its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
PATRICK DOLLARD IN IRAQ last paragraph:

Civil War is not mechanically possible in Iraq. Iraqis are nowhere near mentally and emotionally capable of embracing the concept of a civil war. The average Iraqi is worried about feeding his children on a daily basis. No one is in the mood or position to turn to their wife and say "Honey, I'm just going to stop caring for everyone and pick up a rifle and go with a militia that doesn't exist to a place I can't get even get to, because I'm ticked off at those pesky Shiites today!" We control the highways - the countryside is untraversable for large bodies of people - the supposed enemies couldn't even get to each other to fight if they wanted to. There are no large bodies of armed men, no huge caches of weapons and munitions easily distributable to armies and militias that might even magically appear one morning to fight each other. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1644762/posts

12 posted on 08/03/2006 1:31:08 AM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1644762/posts


13 posted on 08/03/2006 1:31:49 AM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Well over 10,000 have already been killed this year in violence in Iraq (which includes Shia on Shia militia violence) along with the violence the media spends more time on like the suicide bombings and the Shia/Sunni violence. And, I will tell you that as bad as the media might present it to the US public it could get many many many times worse if it were not for leaders like Sistani as well as the presence of the US Army.

As bad as the media might portay it all we have right now is militias nipping at each other and nipping at the Iraqi people. An all out religious war would look quite different with religious leaders telling the masses to arm themselves and kill their fellow Iraqis.


14 posted on 08/03/2006 1:33:32 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: msnimje; null and void
Is this really the worst thing that could happen in Iraq?

This is what Iran wants to have happen. Iraq would be divided - the Kurds would get the north - Iran would take all the areas with oil - and the Sunnis would get barren dessert. Iran wants the old empire back - this is part of that plan. And dems will buy the idea. In the short run it's great. In the long run it's most likely a disaster.

Is this really the worst thing? If the Mullahs are overthrown, and the free people of Iran form a democratic country, it might be great. With the Mullah's in charge, it'll permanently keep the US out of the ME, put control of waaaaaayyyy too much oil in the hands of terrorists, and dramatically increases the power of the enemy. Yeah, that's the worst...

15 posted on 08/03/2006 1:35:35 AM PDT by GOPJ (Al Gore - the original "Millions Could Die" kind of guy....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
A civil war means the end of Iraq.

It could also mean the end of the Middle East. The Sauds and the Iranians could be drawn into the Civil War to protect their religious Brethren. That means a war between the Sunni's and the Shiites. Also combine that with the developing religious Judeo verses Shiite War and always simmering Judeo verses Sunni war. It would quickly escalate to a three way war. The Jews have the full spectrum of WMD. The Shiites have Chemical and Biological WMD and are on the verge of acquiring a nuclear WMD capability. The Sunnis have a Chemical WMD capability and may been developing a Biological WMD capability.

16 posted on 08/03/2006 1:37:26 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Oh, good freakin' grief; here we go again with the civil war talk.


17 posted on 08/03/2006 1:39:36 AM PDT by Allegra (FReeping LIVE! from "the other war zone.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969; msnimje
A civil war means the end of Iraq.

Fortunately, there doesn't appear to be one on the horizon.

18 posted on 08/03/2006 1:41:04 AM PDT by Allegra (FReeping LIVE! from "the other war zone.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Give us your take on this, Allegra. What's happening in Iraq and how long before it settles down?


19 posted on 08/03/2006 1:43:14 AM PDT by fragrant abuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

"Fortunately, there doesn't appear to be one on the horizon."

Oh no! The Beeb will be disappointed!




20 posted on 08/03/2006 1:55:29 AM PDT by Mac1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson