Please note that November 15 is the deadline only after requesting TWO three-month extensions to the reporting deadline.
In other words, the reports are not actually due 4 months from now, they were due over two months ago.
Please also note that this will be the report for 2005, and it's quite unlikely that any of the 2006 donations or expenditures, including those for the fence, will be included in the report.
Expecting MCDC to file reports on time and without multiple extensions of the filing deadline does not constitute holding them "to a different and improperly applied fiduciary standard than any other non-profit in the country"; it is expecting them to comply with the same standards others do, which is not unreasonable.
Now you can apologize for calling me a liar, or forever be labled a dishonest poster.
I dont need to apologize for the obvious.
It's been a month now with _No_ frog marching.
When you can convince a prosecutor in Southern Arizona, I _may_ beleive about a third of what you post.
You might beleive what you post, I know better. I can research on my own.
Just about every negative thing you have posted about Simcox has been disputed by Simcox and the MMDC to my satisfaction.
CAL may be emotional, but she is correct and has posted some rational rebuttals, which you have to go elsewhere to dig up.
I hope you fully research all the volunteer organizations you belong to ever so fully, and have never donated to large charities like Red Cross, or United Way, or churches cause if you have you are a huge hypocrite.
I notice a dearth of comments about the donor you and your pals keep bringing up as though he is being led astray.
If you actually go to the link and read the rebuttal the person you whine about mortgaging his house spent the money on steel for fencing.
I expect a full apology, possibly a crow pie as the fence i built. Not that I would expect it from you or your pals.
Dream on and keep posting tripe about Simcox.