Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
It isn't lost on Brown that the bill's sponsor is a member of the Republican Party -- a party about which she has voiced repeated disappointment as the GOP, the majority party in both chambers, appears to be unable to get pro-life bills enacted.

Judie and her ilk in Wisconsin have actually lobbied against pro-life legislation such as our 24 hour waiting period and parental notification laws. I've had several pro-life state legislators come up to me completely dumbfounded over why ALL's Wisconsin affiliate would join forces with Planned Parenthood to oppose their baby saving legislation. Sadly, these modern day pharisees may well be doing more harm than good in ending the abomination of abortion.

7 posted on 08/02/2006 5:52:41 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ronaldus Magnus

"Judie and her ilk in Wisconsin have actually lobbied against pro-life legislation such as our 24 hour waiting period and parental notification laws. I've had several pro-life state legislators come up to me completely dumbfounded over why ALL's Wisconsin affiliate would join forces with Planned Parenthood to oppose their baby saving legislation. Sadly, these modern day pharisees may well be doing more harm than good in ending the abomination of abortion."

WHOA. Let's get the facts straight.

When did Judie Brown and ALL join Planned Parenthood on anything? Never. Cite the law and cite the "affiliate." If you show me the text of the law, maybe there is a flaw.

ALL isn't against parental notification. It is against exceptions for rape, incest, health of the mother and life of the mother. Why? Because as former abortionist Bernard Nathanson admits, those are abortion ploys - gigantic eyes in the needle (biblical sense) that render laws null and void since it would be easy to get some doc to lie about a woman's health, etc.

Furthermore, there is a way to write into law the priciple of double effect which holds no doctor liable should a child die while the physician is trying to save him and his mother. That's why exceptions are never necessary. (E.g., SD's ban applies double effect.)


16 posted on 08/03/2006 4:32:29 PM PDT by Quiet Man Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson