Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: American_Centurion

Maybe in MD, but in most of the free states, reasonable fear of loss of life or limb is the standard. Doesn't matter if it's actually real or not, the shooter would deservedly get off scot-free.

Not all of us have to rely on the police to protect us.


31 posted on 08/02/2006 10:03:15 AM PDT by Diggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Diggler

I really really doubt that you would get off scot free ANYWHERE under the circumstances described here.

You wouldn't if I were on the jury. I support both packing and using your firearm for self defense, but engaging a target in another vehicle is stupid 99% of the time in my opinion. If for no other reason than you can NOT BE SURE of either your target or what is beyond it.


40 posted on 08/02/2006 10:09:52 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson