Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker; Dianna; SheLion
....study of 116,000 women found a 32% increase in breast cancer rates among smokers.

A 32% increase is statistically insignificant. To achieve statistical significance the % increase must be between 200% and 300%.

Let me ask you a question: Which would you find more scary: exposure/consumption to a substance that has a 19% increase of risk for a disease or a 65% increase for the same disease?????

Please remember my original statement about statistical significance.

167 posted on 08/01/2006 12:33:16 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
A 32% increase is statistically insignificant. To achieve statistical significance the % increase must be between 200% and 300%.

You don't know what you're talking about. Retake basic statistics. In 116,000 women, a 32% increase in a common disease like breast cancer is statistically significant. That's why the sample size is so large.

179 posted on 08/01/2006 1:51:00 PM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson