To: raybbr
Well, maybe that's the motivation of the poster, but the real problem is that he was promoting the junk science of second-hand smoke.
158 posted on
08/01/2006 12:14:10 PM PDT by
AmishDude
(The Constitution: It ain't long, it ain't complicated and it don't take a genius to figure it out.)
To: AmishDude
Well, maybe that's the motivation of the poster, but the real problem is that he was promoting the junk science of second-hand smoke.What is second hand smoke? Is it the unfiltered smoke off the end of the cigarette or the exhaled smoke of the smoker?
Neither is good for anyone but unfiltered smoke has to be the worst.
175 posted on
08/01/2006 1:39:09 PM PDT by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson