To: ncountylee
The Washington Post not satisfied with "reporting" DNC talking points, is now developing them and directing the DNC.
2 posted on
07/31/2006 10:46:42 AM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
Last time this issue was raised Chairman Roberts pointed out that the Dimocrats on the committee hadn't provided their feedback yet. The ball was in their court. How much do you want to bet that they're trying to drag it out to influence the November elections?
4 posted on
07/31/2006 10:48:40 AM PDT by
Dilbert56
To: ncountylee
And someone please post the animation of the guy beating the dead horse if you please.
5 posted on
07/31/2006 10:48:54 AM PDT by
MikeA
(Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
To: ncountylee
Pre-war intelligence said Saddam had WMDs. The Iraq Survey Group looked for WMDs within Iraq, but didn't look at every suspected site before filing its final report, and certainly wasn't able to follow-up on reports that Saddam had moved the bulks of his WMDs to Syria. Any congressional investigation into "pre-war intelligence" should acknowledge that such intelligence on WMDs has never been conclusively refuted or affirmed.
6 posted on
07/31/2006 10:54:23 AM PDT by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: ncountylee
My understanding is that the Republicans want to add in quotes from Democrats about them saying Iraq had WMD and that the Democrats are squealing like stuck pigs and do not want the quotes to be allowed. The Democrats only want to allow Bush Admin quotes about WMD.
7 posted on
07/31/2006 10:59:17 AM PDT by
avacado
To: ncountylee
8 posted on
07/31/2006 11:00:18 AM PDT by
paddles
To: ncountylee
This should be a rather straightforward exercise. List every significant statement about Iraq made by the run up to the war. Then challenge the White House to cite the supporting documentation. It will be easier than it sounds. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report detailed the process for getting information like that into a Presidential speech. The famous 16 words went through at least a half-dozen reviews before the President ever said them. At one point he was clear to cite an estimate as to the tonnage being sought.
BTW, you hear lots of Dims saying the Administration "pressured" the intelligence community to distort their reports. This is absurd on its face and not supported by the facts. First, how much pressure do you have to put on someone to say the same things he's been saying for years? Secondly, David Kay's investigation, the Blue Ribbin Panel's investigation and the SSCI investigation all went to great lengths to solicit example of political pressure being applied. They came up empty. As Dr. Kay said, he wished the problem was political pressure because we know how to fix that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson