To: skeptoid
I know a fellow who beat cancer with his own stem cells.
I haven't heard of a single case of the successful use of embryonic stem cells.
2 posted on
07/31/2006 7:50:58 AM PDT by
VoiceOfBruck
(I am totally serious!)
To: VoiceOfBruck
Since it is a local paper, you only have to read to the fifth paragraph to find out it wasn't a fetal stem cell.
Had this been the NY Slimes, this little "fact" would be buried much deeper, if mentioned at all.
5 posted on
07/31/2006 8:00:02 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: VoiceOfBruck
That's because the embryonic stem cell experiments have not gone well. The usual consequence has been tumor development.
10 posted on
07/31/2006 8:33:37 AM PDT by
mak5
To: VoiceOfBruck; skeptoid
I haven't heard of a single case of the successful use of embryonic stem cells.To a skeptic, it might seem like a cynical search for government funding regardless of the lack of success to date.
Or maybe it's just so very much more complicated than using stem cells from other sources that actually produce results. /sarcasm
14 posted on
07/31/2006 4:55:16 PM PDT by
siunevada
(If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
To: Nightshift
16 posted on
07/31/2006 5:49:41 PM PDT by
tutstar
(Baptist ping list-freepmail to get on or off)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson