Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg Serious About White House Run
News Max ^ | July 30, 2006 | Staff: NewsMax.com

Posted on 07/31/2006 6:12:34 AM PDT by no dems

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will dispose of his multibillion-dollar business holdings next year by giving much of his fortune to charity and using some of the rest to fund a run for president as an independent, a source close to the mayor tells Wall Street Journal columnist John Fund.

But could a Bloomberg candidacy actually succeed?

“Certainly, dissatisfaction with both major parties is high, with large numbers of Americans viewing Republicans as unprincipled and less than competent and Democrats as feckless and unserious,” John Fund writes in the Wall Street Journal.

“Similar conditions gave rise to Ross Perot in 1992, and for a while the diminutive Texas billionaire was running first in the polls. He eventually won 19 percent of the national vote and helped Bill Clinton defeat the first President Bush.”

Bloomberg would hold several advantages over Perot, Fund notes. For one thing, he has actually won two elections, something Perot has never achieved.

As NewsMax reported, political strategist Dick Morris opined that Bloomberg can succeed where Perot failed because – thanks to his years dealing with the national press corps as mayor of the country’s biggest city – he knows how to handle himself in the public spotlight.

"That education makes it unlikely that he will implode with paranoia or be rattled by the antics of the party national committees, as Perot was,” Morris points out.

Also, Bloomberg would likely have even more money to spend than Perot. He was overheard saying he could put up “half a billion.” That’s almost as much as George Bush and John Kerry combined spent during the 2004 race.

According to Fund, the thinking is that a Bloomberg run as an independent would hurt the Democratic candidate more than the Republican.

“As the quintessential urban candidate, Mr. Bloomberg would likely appeal most to city dwellers, who overwhelmingly vote Democratic. Then there are his issue positions. Mr. Bloomberg has run and won twice as a registered Republican in New York, but he supports partial-birth abortion, gun control, and gay rights and opposes the death penalty.”

But the speculation about a Bloomberg run could turn out to be idle, according to Fund. “Bloomberg knows that the odds are against him: No modern third-party candidate has come close to winning, and even if one managed to poll close to 40 percent of the popular vote, it would be hard to carry a majority of the Electoral College.

“Thus, while the mayor could afford the stratospheric spending requirements of a national campaign, observers think that in the end the 64-year-old mayor is likely to skip the race.”

Not so fast, says Paul M. Weyrich, chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation and a NewsMax pundit.

Bloomberg “could decide that the climate is right” for a run as an independent, Weyrich writes.

“Half the country does not want Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, yet she is the likely Democratic nominee. More than half the nation loves John McCain, but most likely he will not be the GOP nominee. So Bloomberg, very much attracted to public service, may just say, ‘To heck with it.’

“Get those ‘Bloomberg for President’ bumper stickers rolling off the presses?”


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bloomberg; bloomberg2008; electionpresident; gopprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
I know that the new third-party, Unity '08, who's Founders Board is predominanly Dems, is very interested in him as a candidate. I hope they nominate him and he runs. He'd take a heck of a lot more votes from the Dem nominee than the Pubbie.
1 posted on 07/31/2006 6:12:34 AM PDT by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems

What's he been smoking?


2 posted on 07/31/2006 6:13:27 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

"Bloomberg Serious About White House Run"

Is there a charity run sheduled at the White House? LOL!
This guy is really psychotic, isn't he?


3 posted on 07/31/2006 6:15:01 AM PDT by TommyDale (It's time to dismiss the Duke fake rape case, Mr. Nifong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Oh no, the RATS would have to counter with Corzine... :)


4 posted on 07/31/2006 6:15:13 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

((( ping )))


5 posted on 07/31/2006 6:15:21 AM PDT by TommyDale (It's time to dismiss the Duke fake rape case, Mr. Nifong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Bloomberg Serious About White House Run

Hey Bloomberg!! Get serious.

6 posted on 07/31/2006 6:16:04 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will dispose of his multibillion-dollar business holdings next year by giving much of his fortune to charity and using some of the rest to fund a run for president as an independent, a source close to the mayor tells Wall Street Journal columnist John Fund.

Bloomberg, like the vast majority of New Yorkers mistakes what happens in the anus of the east coast for reality.

7 posted on 07/31/2006 6:16:05 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

That move would certainly be the worst for the future of the US.


8 posted on 07/31/2006 6:16:09 AM PDT by Concho ((I'd rather be hunting.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

If he ran as a Republican, the neglected-conservative-core of the Republican Party will nail this guy to a cross.


9 posted on 07/31/2006 6:16:18 AM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

What a joke. I wouldn't vote for that RINO. Same goes for the man he replaced.


10 posted on 07/31/2006 6:17:15 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Run, Bloomy, run!
A Bloomberg run as an independent, will simply make it even more certain Republicans win in 2008.
11 posted on 07/31/2006 6:17:45 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

The Democrats know the only what they can get a Clinton in the White House is with the Perot strategy.

It ain't gonna work. I may disagree with McCain or Giuliani on three or four issues, but that isn't enough for me to put a Marxist in the White House during a global war.


12 posted on 07/31/2006 6:17:47 AM PDT by JHBowden (A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence. -- David Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

He is full of himself, and mentally ill.


13 posted on 07/31/2006 6:18:27 AM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I don't think this clown could win the seat of Dog Catcher as a Republican in most other States.


14 posted on 07/31/2006 6:18:53 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (A wall first. A wall now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

People in Hell want ice water.


15 posted on 07/31/2006 6:19:52 AM PDT by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

ROTFLMAO... thanks for this great Monday laugh.


16 posted on 07/31/2006 6:20:49 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
He won't.
He is considering ruining as an independent. Just like Perot.
17 posted on 07/31/2006 6:21:35 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Pests at the polls? Get out the Raid.

18 posted on 07/31/2006 6:24:57 AM PDT by Liz (The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: no dems
ANY media person is always in favor of a well-funded third candidate, for two reasons:

(1) It gives them something else to write about during a boring primary season

(2) Mo' Money! Mo' Money! Mo' Money!!!!

I realize Bloomberg has more money than he knows what to do with, and can waste $500 million, but is his ego so bored in NYC that he needs to take it on a big, wasteful trip?

Throw Nader and Buchanan into that race and we can all watch a three-ring circus of guaranteed losers and their followers who celebrate being irrelevant.
19 posted on 07/31/2006 6:26:38 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems; All
Bloomberg Serious About White House Run

LMAO

20 posted on 07/31/2006 6:29:16 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson