While I have no doubt that Hezbellywood is both possible and likely, be careful saying things such as "the time stamps on the photographers cameras are DIFFERENT." We have no clue what the time stamps are. The only information we have is the "dateline" stamp on the articles that the reporters filed. A reporter may file two dozen photos and then over the next 8 hours file a half dozen stories related to the same incident at different times with changes as time and snooping around demand. The newspapers run with whichever story fits their timeline and pluck what pictures it wants from the dozens filed. In short I may shoot two dozen photos of an incident at 8am, file a report at 8:30 and then file another one at 11am having learned other "facts/fiction" and the media will still choose what pics from 8am to use. It doesn't mean that this kid was being carried out at both 8:30 and 11:00am. |
I stand corrected- you're right. The article doesn't use the words time stamp- but it does go into great detail showing the unlikelihood of the sequence of events if it happened the way Hizzballah says it did.
The time stamps are recoverable from the photos. Check out this article on the EXIF format.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format