Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

This sounds a bit more like Smokey Yunick's "Hot Air Engine", which was turbocharged. Exhaust heat is the only reasonable method of accomplishing this, and with that much heat, much of the legendary detonation resistance of methanol and thus most of its benefits will be lost. The most influential factor on preignition/detonation is the temperature of the intake air, not the fuel or compression ratio.

The corrosiveness of the methanol will only be accelerated at higher temperatures.


121 posted on 08/09/2006 5:59:33 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: 308MBR
"Exhaust heat is the only reasonable method of accomplishing this, and with that much heat, much of the legendary detonation resistance of methanol and thus most of its benefits will be lost. The most influential factor on preignition/detonation is the temperature of the intake air, not the fuel or compression ratio."

To get that kind of reactivity, you've got to heat the methanol a lot hotter than the vaporization point. Methanol boils at 65 degrees C. I am certain that a heater/vaporizer using exhaust heat can be designed that will get the methanol (plus whatever water is "tagging along" with it) into the vapor phase, but well below any "pre-ignition/detonation" point.

"The corrosiveness of the methanol will only be accelerated at higher temperatures."

WRONG. You keep talking like methanol was some kind of horrifically corrosive chemical--it isn't. Water is FAR more corrosive than methanol (and in fact, it is probably the condensing water that is doing most, if not all, of the damage, anyway). As long as the methanol and water are in the vapor phase, NO corrosion will occur. You've got to have a LIQUID phase to get corrosion, because the corrosion is fundamentally an electrochemical process--and that requires a liquid capable of ionic conductivity.

122 posted on 08/09/2006 6:11:02 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson