[Coyoteman]

The Darwinists did not fare well at all.

You are aware that science is not normally done in that manner, and the most scientists are probably lousy debaters, while most of the creationists who would be in such a debate are rather good debaters?

Try a written format and see what you get. Something like, say, FR.

Results are a little different. I have yet to see any rebuttals to the transitionals I post or to the scientific definitions (above). I see denials, but no real rebuttals.

[infoguy]

1. "most scientists are probably lousy debaters, while most of the creationists who would be in such a debate are rather good debaters?"

First of all, I don't know how you reach the conclusion that "creationists" are simply better debaters. That's silly. Second, the proponents of ID are scientists. If you click on any of the names in the Newsbusters article (Stephen Meyer, Michael Behe, Jonathan Wells etc. (not Lee Strobel; he's a writer)), you'll see that these are scientists forwarding the theory!

2. "I have yet to see any rebuttals to the transitionals I post or to the scientific definitions (above). I see denials, but no real rebuttals."

Then you better look here. Scroll down to "Response to Critics." This is only one example.