Your post was a big waste of time by you. See post #37 and check out the links I've posted there. It sounds like you need to educate yourself on the real science of intelligent design.
How does one falsify ID 'theory'?
ID has been around , unchanged, since 1802. Where is the science? where are the proposals to do science? If there are such proposals, why does the Discovery Institute continue to say they really need to get started on the real science?
I am aware that people claiming to be part of the ID movement do actual research and get it published in real science journals. However, this research is invariably mainstream in scope and results.
What specific hypothesis has ID put forward that distinguishes itself from mainstream biology? what would ID expect to find in the fossil record that is different from what mainstream biology expects to find?
ow about DNA. What would an ID researcher expect to find that is different from what a mainstream researcher would expect to find?