Anything that depends on "God/Deity/Supernatural PB&J Sandwitch" as a root cause isn't science. And please don't tell me that ID isn't religious as I have had too may ID supports say that I am not Christian because I refuse to call ID Science.
It is kind of like all those 9/11 'government did it' proofs on the Internet - it doesn't stand up when examined closely by independent reviewers.
Hey! ID theory says that an intelligent designer, at some undesignated time, for purposes unknown, intentionally did something. Exactly what he did is unknown, and how he did it is unknown. Nor is it known where he did this thing that he did, or how long it took him to do it. Whether he worked alone or in teams is unknown. Further, it is unknown if he only had to do this thing once, or if several subsequent interventions were required. The identity of the designer is unknown. His nature is unknown. His origin is unknown. His design methods are unknown. His present location is unknown. Whether the designer still exists is also unknown.
So how could ID not be science?
Well, I'm sorry, but you just reveal an ignorance on the issue. If you don't want to educate yourself on the science behind ID (it doesn't "depend" on "God/Deity/Supernatural PB&J Sandwitch (sic)"), there's nothing else I can say. Good day. You don't know what you're talking about.