And I also know how many power structure wannabee former members level attacks at JimRob.
We both can point to history to bolster our positions. I will take the position that Simcox had better do three things:
Meet the November 15th deadline,
Get some fencing built unless local governments clearly prevent him from doing such, and
Show a mission spending to fundraising ratio over two-thirds (preferably over 3/4ths).
Until then, I will withhold final judgement.
But we are here, posting on FR, right?
And when asked, Jim has been much more forthcoming about his finances than Simcox has.
Where's the fence?