And that's fair as well. Simcox has given people reason to doubt him, and I don't blame the fair-minded for telling him he should have taken care of this by now.
But certain of his critics have their own agendas that they are pursuing here, whether it be animosity towards Keyes or dislike of the anti-illegal-immigration movement in general - or even jealousy of the success Simcox has achieved to date in bring the anti-illegal-movement front and center. We've seen internal food fights at FR over similar petty jealousy, where folks who wanted be part of the FR power structure played all kinds of backstabbing games - and then when they got kicked off, they resorted to attacking JimRob in a manner similar to the attacks we are now seeing against Simcox. So I think it is fair to also question THEIR methods.
Well, then, we agree.
But certain of his critics have their own agendas that they are pursuing here,
And Chris Simcox, and his advocates, are shipping them ammunition. If you're conceding that Simcox "should have taken care of this by now," then you're conceding that the November 15 extension is an unsatisfactory resolution. Simcox will either bleed until then or bleed until he provides the reports before then.
That's a given. It takes a little experience to recognize the players without a program.