Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl

83 worries me a bit. It seems like the urban areas would have no paroled sex offenders living in them at all --2000 feet from a school or park would effectively send all to the suburban and exurban areas that are more spread out in their city planning. Can't we keep the sex offenders out in a remote prison somewhere? Or make them their own town with a high fence around it away from children?

It just worries me as a citizen of the great Central Valley of California--we have enough problems without the urban sex ickies coming to living here.


27 posted on 07/28/2006 11:33:59 PM PDT by kmiller1k (remain calm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kmiller1k; calcowgirl
"83 worries me a bit. It seems like the urban areas would have no paroled sex offenders living in them at all --2000 feet from a school or park would effectively send all to the suburban and exurban areas that are more spread out in their city planning"

That is a baseless assumption. It's the suburbs that are dotted with schools and parks; the cities tend to have their schools somewhat centralized. 83 would help to keep them out of young family neighborhoods. 2000 feet is less than 1/2 mile.

43 posted on 07/29/2006 4:32:27 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson