To: STARWISE
<< Nifong also said there was evidence he hoped to have in the case, such as DNA, but that it didn't pan out.
"There were things we hoped to have in terms of evidence that we ended up not having," >>
As in 'the "things" we hoped to have in terms of "evidence"' simply do not exist. There is no "evidence."
34 posted on
07/29/2006 12:54:50 AM PDT by
Brian Allen
("In war there is no substitute for victory." General Douglas MacArthur)
To: Brian Allen
He needs to be indicted .. hope the Duke guys can go after him .. his selfish greed has stained their lives horribly.
35 posted on
07/29/2006 1:09:16 AM PDT by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: Brian Allen
<<"There were things we hoped to have in terms of evidence that we ended up not having," >>
Well, doesn't a DA wait until he has the evidence before he indicts?
Isn't that an admission of incompetence or rush to judgment right there?
To: Brian Allen
Nifong also said there was evidence he hoped to have in the case, such as DNA, but that it didn't pan out.
"There were things we hoped to have in terms of evidence that we ended up not having,"
To me you got the money quote. He admits he did not follow the evidence. He made up his mind based on Mangum's claim and ignored the evidence.
57 posted on
07/29/2006 11:08:14 PM PDT by
JLS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson