I was a little confused by this article. The author refutes most of the arguments that form the basis of Global Warming theory and then seems to say there are better ways to fight global warming. Did I miss something here?
The best course is one in which we continue to use our economic wherewithal to invest in successful companies, which are generally those that produce things efficiently or produce efficient things.I don't think he's saying that the 'best course' has anything to do with global warming. It's the best course to take regardless of any purported 'global warming' that may or may not be occurring and whether or not it's caused by man.