[Lee'sGhost]

You must not have read the rest of the article. The "long and distinguished" part was clearly tongue in cheek.

[EyeGuy]

"You must not have read the rest of the article. The "long and distinguished" part was clearly tongue in cheek."


Oh, but I did.

---

I read it as "long and distinguished".........

BUT

THEN, the FOX point was made.

---

My take is that the inital descriptors were a wimpy attempt to soften the blow.

[EyeGuy]

"You must not have read the rest of the article. The "long and distinguished" part was clearly tongue in cheek."


Oh, but I did.

---

I read it as "long and distinguished".........

BUT

THEN, the FOX point was made.

There was also this:


"Is Walter Cronkite a man who deserves to be honored for his contributions to American life? Absolutely."

---

My take is that the inital descriptors were a wimpy attempt to soften the blow.