Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wombat101

"I take issue with the concept that incinerating hundreds of thousands with one bomb was more "humane" or "moral" than incinerating hundreds of thousands with an entire fleet of bombers. But maybe that's just me."

One must wonder what Sherman would have thought more humane..


11 posted on 07/28/2006 8:47:54 AM PDT by artifax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: artifax

"One must wonder what Sherman would have thought more humane.."

Or Scipio Africanus.Or even Ghenghis Khan, for that matter.

I do not discount that such inhumanity is innate to warfare. To deny that is ridiculous in the face of the evidence. However, the scale of the suffering delivered dwarfs anything Sherman, Scipio or Ghengis was ever capable of because of the reach and destructiveness of modern weaponry.

In the case of Sherman, while the infrastructure of the South was systematicaaly destroyed, you won't find Sherman's troops going out of their way to deliberately target civilians, unlike, say, Bomber Harris or Curtis LeMay.


14 posted on 07/28/2006 8:52:03 AM PDT by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson