(Fonseca) said he was going to build a home and, one day, a shop (on the land), Ramsey said Thursday, speaking from his adjacent property in Crawford. He told me that Katrina wiped him out.. . . . It didnt even occur to me that he could use it for this.
Fonseca confirmed he never indicated to his new neighbors that the land would be transferred to Sheehan, but he said that was always the plan. He said the $52,500 used to pay for the property a spread of rustic, wooded prairie with no houses came from Sheehan and her Gold Star Families for Peace.
Fonseca said he acted as an agent for Sheehan, negotiating the purchase and closing the deal with Ramsey.
Theyre really good neighbors, Fonseca said of families nearby. The idea again is that were here to be good neighbors, to make it as comfortable as we can for everyone.
So let me get this right, Fonseca knows all along he's buying the property as a front for Sheehan yet tells the seller he's going to build on the site. yet he believes they can be 'good neighbors' when the entire deal was built upon a deceit. Yeah, right! Once a lying a$$, always a lying a$$.
So is there any legal action the seller can take after being deceived by the buyer? I know zero about law.