[RFC_Gal]

I like science, as one can see from my nic.

It isn't bashing to point out that Ann Colter got most everything in those three chapters incorrect. If I was bashing her I would be bashing her on other topics, but I am not. I disagree with her on those issues and I tend to let people know when I disagree - it's just the way I am.

I am sure Ann Colter is a nice person, but she appears to not know very much about science.

Been reading freerepublic for years - just didn't have the time to make an account till now. It takes time and effort to start a small business and having a FR posting account would have taken up too much of my time as it can be rather addicting.

[tonysamm]

If you're a scientist, then prove that Coulter got the "Darwinism" portion of her book wrong with proof positive from the fossil record.

[expatpat]

I like science, as one can see from my nic.

Huh!? What does RFC stand for? Radio-frequency Current?

[Sam Hill]

"Been reading freerepublic for years - just didn't have the time to make an account till now. It takes time and effort to start a small business and having a FR posting account would have taken up too much of my time as it can be rather addicting."

You seem to have found plenty of time to post in the last ten days. LOL

What did this thread have to do with Coulter's knowledge of science?

That's a rhetorical question. I realize you just showed up to bash her. And it didn't matter what the subject of the thread was.

That's "helping the cause" all right.

But what's your cause?

[stands2reason]

You don't have to explain yourself to Sam Hill.

He's under the impression that if you don't like Ann, you are a troll and he'll attack you for that.

[gondramB]

>>I like science, as one can see from my nic. <<

You don't just like science, you've outed yourself as a geek. :)