[KeepUSfree]

My problem is that 99% of the time "good parents" would never get a son like this. Unless he is the 1% directly claimed by the anti-christ, there's probably a reason he is such a loser....and I would suspect it has to do with parenting. Looks like a case of reaping the whirlwind (although, this is pure conjecture) to me

. Not that I condone his actions and don't think he shouldn't be slowly totured......

[Robert Drobot]

".... there's probably a reason he is such a loser....and I would suspect it has to do with parenting...."

Not according to her grandson.

[WLR]

You know if the press lies about other stuff why would you not suspect the press is lying about this?

W

[Robert Drobot]

Do you suppose Anthony Marshall hired Michael Schiavo as a consultant?

[Fairview]

. . .99% of the time "good parents" would never get a son like this. Unless he is the 1% directly claimed by the anti-christ, there's probably a reason he is such a loser....and I would suspect it has to do with parenting. Looks like a case of reaping the whirlwind. . .

Maybe. But if you're suggesting that Brooke Astor was a bad mother and created a bad son, recall that this article says nothing about Marshall's father, who is also fifty percent of the equation. There's nothing about Brooke Astor's exemplary life to suggest that she was not a good mother, and it's an outrage to suggest that this is somehow her fault.

People make their own choices about morality no matter how well or badly they're raised.

Good parenting makes a difference, true. I know people who were raised in concentration camps, watching their loved ones getting machine-gunned by Nazis or Pol Pots guys, and they still grew up to be decent human beings; we all know people who were raised in loving homes who grew up to be car thieves and gang members.