Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver

Sorry, through with you. You're into insults. Other people can carry your arguments, but I don't need your crap.


89 posted on 07/26/2006 6:06:53 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

"orry, through with you. You're into insults. Other people can carry your arguments, but I don't need your crap."

Don't care if you respond or not. I didn't insult, I said the argument used was silly. All of the anti gun arguments you are using are old. They've all been thought out, researched and found to be faulty. Thats not an insult, thats a challenge to come up with an original argument.

Law abiding gun owners commit very few gun crimes. Most crimes are committed by criminals.


108 posted on 07/26/2006 6:35:06 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

#86 was a perfectly valid question, which remains:

Where does the Constitution express limitations due to technology?

(Hint: it's not the technology, it's what's done with it.)


250 posted on 07/27/2006 2:18:35 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson