Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bone52
It was her decision as well.

If she's as nutty as he says she was, she's incapable of making good decisions - especially judging by the fact she killed her kids.

Until all the details of the impregnation are released

What? What details do you need? Together, they had another baby. I'm not sure where you're getting from my post that he is more responsible for his children's death. If you want to get technical, he didn't hold their heads under water and kill them. But he sure knew his wife was crazy. Why would any husband, who cared for his wife and kids, not do what the doctors advise?

381 posted on 07/26/2006 12:16:50 PM PDT by TightyRighty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: TightyRighty

With details of the impregnation, I mean-

Failure of birth control?
Use of birth control?
No birth control?

There are plenty of things that we do not know about how this pregnancy occured. I assume that the Dr. you are referring to is the psychiatrist who advised them not to have children. From all of my experience with shrinks, I wouldn't listen to or trust them either.

Your statement that "technically" the father did not kill his children implicates the father as the guilty party in this crime. That, while he did not physically hold the kids under the water, he was the force that drove his wife to this act.

Frankly, I don't care if she is insane or not, she killed her kids in a merciless and cold-blooded fashion. She should die. And in all honestly, there is more mercy in a painless death than in years in a mental hospital.


394 posted on 07/26/2006 12:43:26 PM PDT by bone52 (Fight Terrorists.... Blow up the Eiffel Tower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

To: TightyRighty

With details of the impregnation, I mean-

Failure of birth control?
Use of birth control?
No birth control?

There are plenty of things that we do not know about how this pregnancy occured. I assume that the Dr. you are referring to is the psychiatrist who advised them not to have children. From all of my experience with shrinks, I wouldn't listen to or trust them either.

Your statement that "technically" the father did not kill his children implicates the father as the guilty party in this crime. That, while he did not physically hold the kids under the water, he was the force that drove his wife to this act.

Frankly, I don't care if she is insane or not, she killed her kids in a merciless and cold-blooded fashion. She should die. And in all honestly, there is more mercy in a painless death than in years in a mental hospital.


395 posted on 07/26/2006 12:43:29 PM PDT by bone52 (Fight Terrorists.... Blow up the Eiffel Tower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson