Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

The Federal Constitution has nothing to do with performing marriages. Only in recognizing documents and contracts issued in other states.

That is not true. Here is the law... pay attention to the red typeface.

Article IV.

Section. 1.

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

Only Congress can define the effect by law...
_________________________________________________________
There is still the tenth amendment which is what I had in mind when I said the federal government has no jurisdiction over whether or not marriages can be PERFORMED. The Feds cannot make laws about performing homosexual marriage except for overseas jurisdiction/military etc. The Congress may only prescribe ways to proove whether a marriage license is valid if a state chooses to grant one.


94 posted on 07/27/2006 1:00:43 AM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: old republic
I said the federal government has no jurisdiction over whether or not marriages can be PERFORMED.

Also not true... It was landmark U.S. Supreme Court precedent Reynolds v. United States in 1878 that made “separation of church and state” a dubiously legitimate point of case law, but more importantly; it confirmed the Constitutionality in statutory regulation of marriage practices...

102 posted on 07/27/2006 7:05:40 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson