Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
If you're talking about building one, it would almost be impossible to do. A uranium gun weapon isn't hard to construct but getting enough HEU, forming it into the proper shapes, and getting enough high explosive shaped charges isn't something that can be done by walking into your local Radio Shack. Building a plutonium bomb is much more difficult.

If you're talking about them buying a functional nuclear device, it is (very slightly) possible but the weapon would have to be maintained. Just having it sit around for a while would greatly reduce the chances it would function as designed. That is why the mythical "suitcase nukes" are not a threat. They have long since passed their shelf life. (True "suitcase nukes" don't exist but the smallest nuclear weapons require very regular maintenance in order to function.)

14 posted on 07/25/2006 5:59:36 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: COEXERJ145

Thanks. I guess I won't put my cat-5 hurricane bunker underground just yet, lol.


16 posted on 07/25/2006 6:03:42 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson