You are ignoring the obvious:
"There's also a chance that opponents could try to use some of McClintock's views -- opposition to abortion, for example -- to tar Schwarzenegger as he tries to win over moderates and independents. But pro-choice Californians could always split the ticket. "
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1582375/posts
I have just posted this on another thread, but it'a a good test for all those you pinged.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671927/posts?page=21#21
OK. Here is a multiple choice question for you. Do you prefer a or b? You have to pick a or b. WHICH will you pick?
a. Arnold runs around campaigning for the Republican candidates in CA, even hopeless ones, like Mountjoy, it doesn't do the Republicans any good, Arnold ends up typecasting himself and loses to Angelides.
b. Arnold runs a more moderate campaigning, being careful to not give Angelides a chance to portray him as a "dreaded right winger", Arnold does fundraising to some R. candidates, WINS the election and other Republicans win too on his coattails.
===
Well, let's here from everyone. Do you prefer a or b?
And just what did Mountjoy do to you? Just can't resisit slamming conservatives eh? Unity. Yeah, right, only if it's a RINO.
b. Arnold runs a more moderate campaigning,
By proffering socialized medicine? You call that "moderate"? Need I remind you what the voters thought of HillaryCare?
Your questions show that you have absolutely no faith have nothing but disdain for the Republican platform.
Here's what you are selling, FO:
Big spending, HUGE borrowing, free health clinics in schools, liberal judges, state land grabs, more gun regulation, bogus trade programs, prescription drug programs, global warming regulations, opposition to offshore drilling, envirowacko energy alternatives (as gas prices soar and blackouts are threatened).
I don't want any part of it.
Hey, its a big tent.