To: marron; Fenris6
If you are going to be so aggressive in posting on this topic, you two should at LEAST bother to learn the facts of what is going on around the world. Start with what NATO is doing in Afghanistan. Either Isareli or US forces would simply move the front since we are the terrorists primary foes. A NATO force doesn't generate the same propaganda resonace with the Terrorits and the Nationalists. Unlike UN they have the military muscle and the professionalism to do the job, unlike US or Israel they do not generate the same sort Nationalistic knee jerk counter response. They are a capable neutral third party that can be used to seperate the foes. We have other fish to fry so we most certainly will NOT be putting our forces in there
30 posted on
07/25/2006 9:52:21 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: MNJohnnie
If you are going to be so aggressive in posting on this topic, you two should at LEAST bother to learn the facts of what is going on around the world. Start with what NATO is doing in Afghanistan I'm well-aware of what NATO has done in Afganistand, esp Germany. Your response to him was the aggressive one.
We all agree that a NATO force is preferable to UN or US force. The question remains, which NATO countries will step up...
34 posted on
07/25/2006 10:21:34 AM PDT by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: MNJohnnie
If you are going to be so aggressive in posting on this topic, you two should at LEAST bother to learn the facts of what is going on around the world. Start with what NATO is doing in Afghanistan. Either Isareli or US forces would simply move the front since we are the terrorists primary foes. A NATO force doesn't generate the same propaganda resonace with the Terrorits and the Nationalists. Unlike UN they have the military muscle and the professionalism to do the job, unlike US or Israel they do not generate the same sort Nationalistic knee jerk counter response. They are a capable neutral third party that can be used to seperate the foes. We have other fish to fry so we most certainly will NOT be putting our forces in there You've got issues. Beyond the normal kindergarten type, one of them is asserting that the muslims would consider NATO to be a neutral player. The islamists would howl at the idea of European or Turkish troops policing them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson