Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATO belongs in Lebanon
National Post (Toronto, Canada) ^ | July 25, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 07/25/2006 8:54:12 AM PDT by La Enchiladita

We have a lot of respect for Condoleezza Rice. For the U.S. Secretary of State, who is currently in the midst of a whirlwind Middle East tour, the path of least diplomatic resistance would have been to echo the widespread call for an immediate ceasefire in the war between Hezbollah and Israel. But to her great credit -- and that of her boss, President George W. Bush -- she didn't. Instead, this week, she told Lebanese officials that any ceasefire would have to be part of a broader deal that included Hezbollah's withdrawal from Lebanon's border with Israel, and the deployment of an international force to guard the peace. "The situation on the border cannot return to what it was before July 12," Ms. Rice declared. She's also said she wants to avoid any deal that produces a "false promise" which leads to "a guarantee of future violence."

The idea of a "ceasefire" always sounds appealing on its face. War is hell, after all. But in this case, a ceasefire without conditions would only lead to more war. Hezbollah would claim that its rocket attacks had tamed the mighty Zionists, and cast the stillborn ground war as proof that Israel was afraid of confronting Hezbollah's Jihadis. Rather than discourage future attacks -- Israel's goal in its ongoing campaign -- Hezbollah would be encouraged to send more rockets and terrorists into Israel in the days to come. As Ms. Rice says, such a peace would be a false one.

No war goes on forever. And this one will likely end in a week or two. By that time, we hope, Israel will have destroyed a sufficient quantity of Hezbollah materiel and killed a sufficient number of jihadis to render risible any claim to victory by Hezbollah or its puppetmasters in Tehran and Damascus. We also hope Israeli troops end the operation in full control of the Lebanese side of the Israel-Lebanon border, including the villages where Hezbollah's assets are concentrated.

The question is: What then? There is no such thing as a power vacuum in the Middle East. When the Israeli army evacuates Lebanon, Hezbollah will simply reoccupy the territory -- unless a third-party force lays claim. Ideally, that force would be the Lebanese army. But there seems little hope of that: Lebanon's military is weak, and its leadership has been co-opted by Hezbollah sympathizers. Any effort to deploy the army in southern Lebanon could lead to civil war.

So who should be keeping the peace in southern Lebanon? Kofi Annan, naturally, thinks it should be the United Nations. So does Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, who claims that any peacekeeping force deployed to his country must fly the UN flag.

But if this job does go to the UN, Israel will have waged its war of self-defence for nothing. The fact is, the United Nations already has a 2,000-strong peacekeeping force in Lebanon called UNIFIL. It's hasn't lifted a finger to stop attacks on Israel. And given the poisonous anti-Israel bias that suffuses the UN, we shouldn't expect any new force deployed under the blue banner to be any different.

The best course -- which has been proposed by the United States and greeted favourably by Israel -- is to deploy a well-armed NATO contingent with a robust combat mandate. This force would not be a doormat-style UN force, but one akin to the allied force currently engaging the Taliban in the south of Afghanistan.

Deploying such a force -- preferably under UN auspices, and preferably including a strong Canadian contingent -- would send exactly the right message to Hezbollah and its bosses in Iran: that the West stands united behind Israel in its fight against militant Islam, and that any unprovoked attack on Israel is an attack on civilized nations everywhere.

© National Post 2006


TOPICS: Canada; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: hizballah; israel; lebanon; nato; peretz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
This comes out of the more conservative part of Canada. The case is lucid and logical, but would it bring about the desired result: the extinction of Hizb'Allah? And, what of Hamas?
1 posted on 07/25/2006 8:54:14 AM PDT by La Enchiladita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Any military force that is not willing to aggressively confront Hezbollah, or whatever militia eventually replaces Hezbollah, will actually wind up enabling and providing cover for it.

Which leads to the question. Besides possibly the Anglo Americans (who are busy elsewhere) which European militaries would be willing and capable of aggressively confronting Hezbollah?

I can't think of any. Which means that not only are UN peacekeepers a non-starter, NATO is probably a non-starter as well.


2 posted on 07/25/2006 8:59:58 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

I thought there already was a UN presence in Lebanon--and they do nothing as it is.


3 posted on 07/25/2006 9:00:50 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (Jesus a perfect 10 v. Allah 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

And Canadian forces are good to go. I served alongside them.

But a NATO force should also involve the Euros. If capable...


4 posted on 07/25/2006 9:01:10 AM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

The Iranians are so predictable. They looked into their archives and saw the visage of Jimmy Carter paralyzed in the Rose Garden over the hostage crisis and decided that's the way to neutralize the west, by kidnapping. Not sure it'll work any more.


5 posted on 07/25/2006 9:02:00 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marron

LOL. We were posting at the same time and both used "Europeans" and "capable[?]".


6 posted on 07/25/2006 9:03:02 AM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

If they do not disavow terrorism, then both need to become extinct.


7 posted on 07/25/2006 9:03:14 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

We share the same doubts.


8 posted on 07/25/2006 9:09:45 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
One problem at a time. Dealing with the Iranian beachhead on the Mediterranean that Hizbollah represents is the 1st step. Close out the Lebanon front frees us up to deal with the next problem. War is a series of campaigns, not a single high stake winner take all poker hand
9 posted on 07/25/2006 9:12:08 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
NATOIsrael belongs in Lebanon There, fixed it.
10 posted on 07/25/2006 9:13:08 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Too bad your opinions are not based in any understanding of actual current events. NATO is doing a very fine job in Afganistan doing exactly this stabilization mission.

Be nice if ONE time the Freeper Arm Chair Generals would actually bother to learn even the most basic facts rather then mindlessly posting their daily Know Nothing rantings.

11 posted on 07/25/2006 9:15:22 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Israel tired that in 1982. It leads to an endless war. NATO could be a 3rd party that could be an legitimate stabilization force like they are in Afghanistan. Israel being in Lebanon merely moves the front, it does not solve the problem.
12 posted on 07/25/2006 9:17:09 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

"United Nations already has a 2,000-strong peacekeeping force in Lebanon called UNIFIL. It's hasn't lifted a finger to stop attacks on Israel."

In fact, it has closely observed the Hezbollah buildup of installations, firing points, and arms buildup since 2000 when Israel withdrew, not to mention loaning its vehicles to Hezbollah......


13 posted on 07/25/2006 9:18:08 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Disagree, the war is happening now precisely because Israel eventually pulled out of Lebanon. They need to go back in for good, until every Arab state recognizes their right to exist.


14 posted on 07/25/2006 9:18:59 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marron

"Which leads to the question. Besides possibly the Anglo Americans (who are busy elsewhere) which European militaries would be willing and capable of aggressively confronting Hezbollah? "

Serbia and Romania... but that's all. Western Europe is too weak, too anti-Semitic, too old to defend itself.


15 posted on 07/25/2006 9:20:00 AM PDT by navyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

NATO, prepositioned to attack Israel. No thanks. Memories of what happened to Serbia. The Kosovan Liberation Army was no less brutal than Hezebola.


16 posted on 07/25/2006 9:20:46 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
NATO is doing a very fine job in Afganistan doing exactly this stabilization mission.

I'll grant you that. Point taken.

17 posted on 07/25/2006 9:24:44 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin; timsbella

Ping!

Personally, unless any NATO contingent had the level of numbers, force, equipment, and most imporantly, political backing from the countries themselves, they'd be about as useful as controlling and stopping the hezbollatiles as the UN "force" was (i.e., about as useful as a sun porch on a submarine).


18 posted on 07/25/2006 9:25:26 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (The Arab League jihad continues on like a fart in an elevator - FR American in Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
NATO belongs in Lebanon

Like fish need bicycles.

19 posted on 07/25/2006 9:25:59 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Screaming your ignorance louder doesn't change it to fact.


20 posted on 07/25/2006 9:27:06 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson