Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WmShirerAdmirer

Lol. This news will drive the dems crazy after all they've done to poison the well.

I was so impressed by Duncan Hunter at the Congressional Hearing on WMD's last month. Especially his questioning of Kay and getting him to say that politicians saying there were no WMD's was Not accurate.....

REP. HUNTER: I understand. And so, when we have people who -- when we have descriptions on the House floor -- and I want to quote a couple to you, because you're a fair gentleman. "There were no," and I'm quoting, "there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq." That's not accurate, is it?

MR. KAY: It's not accurate by my personal knowledge.

REP. HUNTER: Okay. "We are spending billions of dollars to occupy a country that did not have weapons of mass destruction." That's not accurate, is it?

MR. KAY: That's certainly not how I would phrase it, let me say that.

REP. HUNTER: "There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but there are WMDs in D.C. Lies are weapons of mass destruction." That's not accurate, is it?

MR. KAY: D.C.'s a dangerous place, but not in that sense.

REP. HUNTER: Okay. "We know that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We know that to be the case." That's not accurate, is it?

MR. KAY: I think -- look, I don't want to get into criticizing your colleagues. We all knew that in Iraq we were going to find chemical weapons produced prior to 1991.

***. HUNTER: But Dr. Kay, you say we all knew. I don't agree with that. I think that most American people -- that's one reason we're having the hearing -- you say I kind of expected to find these. I think after the massive number of volume of statements to the effect of what I just read to you that have been going on in town hall meetings, coming out of the radio, the television, the newspaper -- if you ask the average American today if any weapons of mass destruction, even today before this hearing is aired, if there are any weapons of mass destruction, any chemical weapons found in Iraq, I think 99.9 percent of them are going to tell you no. I've been listening to television and radio. They're going to say no, there aren't. That's been asserted.

I've seen -- this has been the order of the day. The statements that I just quoted to you aren't radical statements that were made by a few people. Those are statements that have been made thousands and thousands of times in thousands of forums. And that's why I think it's good, now that we've found 500 of them -- albeit they're not brand new rounds, they're not full-up -- they probably aren't the end of our discovery. It's important for people to know that, is it not? Facts are good to get out.

MR. KAY: Facts are always good to get out


16 posted on 07/25/2006 5:09:03 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Nice to hear that it's 50%, not 99%. The truth is getting out.


18 posted on 07/25/2006 5:11:04 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

Thank you for this information!


40 posted on 07/25/2006 7:42:55 AM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson