Questionable books (Minuteman-Simcox)

The Washington Times ^ | July 25, 2006 | Staff

[Anti-Bubba182]

As supporters of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, we were disheartened to read Jerry Seper's front-page article Thursday about questions and criticisms of President Chris Simcox's management of the organization. According to the article, the volunteer group has not made any financial statements or fundraising records public since April 2005 -- circumstances that have strained relations between Mr. Simcox and several of his top employees, some of whom have resigned in protest.

Mr. Simcox must resolve these problems quickly. Failure to do so would only encourage the organization's critics -- who have made no secret of their desire to see the Minuteman volunteers arrested for vigilantism. But more importantly, according to Mr. Simcox's estimate, Americans have donated $1.6 million to the corps because they believe in their mission to secure the southern border. In return, the least they should expect is transparency and the assurance that their donations went to help the volunteers in the field. But the truth is that no one except Mr. Simcox knows how much money has been donated and what it has been used for.

So far, Mr. Simcox has been unable to come up with a good explanation -- at least one that can be independently verified. And while he insists the money went to help field operations, workers at these locations tell a different story. For instance, Vern Kilburn, who resigned earlier this year as director of operations for the organization's northern Texas sector, told The Washington Times that only two checks for $1,000 came from Minuteman headquarters in October and that other directors across the country "are having similar problems." Some volunteers said that money promised by Mr. Simcox for food and supplies never arrived. "An awful lot of equipment I saw was donated," said Mike Gaddy,...."

[EternalVigilance]

That has to be the most ridiculous post you've ever made.

[catholicfreeper]

You just wait. This could really explode. This is much more than the just the minutemen. I suspect people from the liberal side are worried about this too. I am sure they have some comparative scam overon their side that is taking 80 to 90 cents out of every dollar to line peoples pockets. Once some enterprising young hungry journalist starts to see what the real problem is then this thing is off off to the races.

[Paige]

There is a difference ....according to Webster's.... with the two words "Biter" and "Bitter."

Thanks !

[EternalVigilance]

So what if they list me? That doesn't mean I support Cox.

[Amelia]

You think because a consulting firm lists me on its website that I support John Cox...I don't support Cox.

That's probably true, now.

[EternalVigilance]

Your suppositions are, as usual, several clicks off of reality.

[Howlin]

You think because a consulting firm lists me on its website

Why would they have your name on their web site if you're not working for him?

Don't you care that a man you do not support is using your name as a reference?

[EternalVigilance]

That's probably true, now.

Now you're linking to a bunch of teenaged kids blogging in their basements with no knowledge of anything.

Your sourcing continues its downward spiral...

[Amelia]

So what if they list me? That doesn't mean I support Cox.

If you'll notice, the post you responded to wasn't directed to you.

[EternalVigilance]

Everyone listed is an independent consultant. They can work for whomever they please.

Y'all have spent hours sitting here gloating over these wonderful "facts" you've found.

Only problem for you, as is too often the case these days, your "facts" aren't "facts" at all.

[Registered]

You think because a consulting firm lists me on its website that I support John Cox.

Unfortunately, your credibility as being an impartial fighter for the conservative cause tanked when the dots were connected.

Like George Allen, he thinks a virtual fence is sufficient.

Well virtual vs a few miles of cattle fence, I'd say both work just about as well in keeping out illegals.

[Amelia]

Your suppositions are, as usual, several clicks off of reality.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

[EternalVigilance]

If you'll notice, the post you responded to wasn't directed to you.

Right. It only had my name in it. Sheesh.

You're making a fool of yourself, Amelia.

You're so intent on your destructive agenda, you're losing all grasp on reality.

[Rex Anderson]

Your name and email (with your name@robertmorrisgroup.com) are listed in the contact area of of a political consulting website that advertises internet presence.

[Texasforever]

OOOPS

[EternalVigilance]

when the dots were connected.

The only problem is that you and your new friends' dot-connecting skills are obviously so faulty.

[Amelia]

I don't support Cox.

Did you check out post #232, EV?

[Howlin]

Everyone listed is an independent consultant. They can work for whomever they please. Y'all have spent hours sitting here gloating over these wonderful "facts" you've found. Only problem for you, as is too often the case these days, your "facts" aren't "facts" at all.

Oh, I think we get it.

The fact as you explain them is that you don't work for anybody, but somehow you make a living doing nothing for anybody -- with the added benefit of having your days free to argue with housewives on the internet.

We're no longer arguing about what you ARE, EV; we're discussing your fee.

[EternalVigilance]

Your name and email (with your name@robertmorrisgroup.com) are listed in the contact area of of a political consulting website that advertises internet presence.

Oooooohhhhh....

*eyeroll*

[Amelia]

All washed up.....