This has nothing to do with the government/FDA.
I realize not this, but rather, you and your opinion based on anecdotal evidence has nothing to do with the government/FDA. So long as you know that the government is violating the parental rights of their 16-year-old son and their cognizant decision.
I did NOT say I thought the government should force these parents to subject their child to chemotherapy if they choose to reject it. I don't think a court should be able to do that any more than I think the courts should have been able to order a helpless woman to be starved to death. I was just expressing my opinion in light of a parent who would not want to see their child die when there is a high probability of his being cured with the available treatment.