Skip to comments.
DNC: Move Over Whitey
Rolling Stone ^
| Julyh 24, 2006
| Tim Dickinson
Posted on 07/24/2006 2:09:03 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: wouldntbprudent
Sure, why not? Could not do any worse a job then the Democrats have been doing since 1960.
2
posted on
07/24/2006 2:10:15 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: MNJohnnie
BUUUUUUUUUUT,the dems make sure theat both states are still predominently white...They are not going to let a bunch of blacks and hispanics pick their candidate!!!!!Hey Dems,you want diversity????Why not pick arizona and alabama?????Now these have minorties....Why not a state that has at least 50% minority?????
3
posted on
07/24/2006 2:14:47 PM PDT
by
fishbabe
To: fishbabe
Ok Babe, I surrender. Given the current leanings and political dogmas of the Democrat Party Leadership I suggest they hold their 1st primary in Havana Cuba. They will feel RIGHT at home and pretty sure Cuba is not predominately "white". However maybe Zimbabwe would be more to their liking? Cuba might still be too "white" for them?
4
posted on
07/24/2006 2:18:29 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: wouldntbprudent
Um.....the winner of the Iowa/New Hampshire primaries are seldomly selected as Presidential candidates.
You ever notice how libs tell us that we're not supposed to see skin color and then spend all their time looking at it?
5
posted on
07/24/2006 2:22:24 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: MNJohnnie
I was just venting..Can wash d.c. vote????Its 80% black...
6
posted on
07/24/2006 2:30:25 PM PDT
by
fishbabe
To: MNJohnnie
You're so 1970's. Real liberals go to Venezuela. I'm awaiting the announcement that the DNC will hold their 2008 convention there.
7
posted on
07/24/2006 2:33:43 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
To: fishbabe
:-) Come on Babe! Get in the spirit. Why you so grim?
If we cannot laugh at Liberal who WILL we be able to laugh at?
8
posted on
07/24/2006 2:34:56 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: wouldntbprudent
So, let me see if I understand this right - They'll hold early primaries where northeastern liberal democrats hold little sway?
Gosh, didn't they get the press release from Rove that he wants Hilary to run?
9
posted on
07/24/2006 2:35:21 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
To: wouldntbprudent
They should hold the first Democrat primary in Mississippi. That would be interesting, to say the least.
10
posted on
07/24/2006 2:35:26 PM PDT
by
somniferum
(Annoy a liberal.. Work hard and be happy.)
To: kingu
I am NOT '70s! I am fashionalby Retro! I mean, if the Democrats Leadership 2006 Election year slogan is going to be "Back to the '60s," (on second thought given their recent retoric that could be the 1860s they were speaking about) I don't see why WE cannot get in the spirit of the thing?
11
posted on
07/24/2006 2:37:12 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: wouldntbprudent
"DNC: Move Over Whitey"
"What did I do wrong? :-("
To: fishbabe
Why don't they ask some of the minorities on Howard Dean's former campaign staff what they should do?
13
posted on
07/24/2006 2:42:18 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: wouldntbprudent
The racist party hard at work to maintain tranquility on the plantation.
14
posted on
07/24/2006 2:54:00 PM PDT
by
scory
To: wouldntbprudent
I'm not sure why this isn't considered hate speech, but I'm sure the liberals will find a "nuanced" way to explain it.
I hope they move it wherever makes them happy. They're losers now, and will always be losers.
15
posted on
07/24/2006 2:57:22 PM PDT
by
Vision
("...cause those liberal freaks go to farrrrrr")
To: wouldntbprudent
New Hampshire (95% white) and Iowa (93% white),
Do I live in the wrong state, or what?
16
posted on
07/24/2006 2:59:54 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
To: wouldntbprudent
Move over, Lewis Black! I can't wait for the democrat primaries! I can't wait to watch that pack of total losers snapping at each other to be the king "rat." Unless I've missed someone, there doesn't seem to be anyone in the running who is worth even two cents or two seconds of serious consideration. Hopefully, we will all hear more from Dean and Kerry and Clinton and Gore. lol And then there will be those sly, under the radar rats like Obama, who will walk softly and carry a soft stick. lol Gosh! This will be better than the TV sweeps! lol
To: wouldntbprudent

Whitey was unavailable for comment.
18
posted on
07/24/2006 3:05:07 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(I like liberals...they taste like CHICKEN.)
To: wouldntbprudent
So they need to add Republican states to get some "ethnic diversity."
To: Tzimisce
the winner of the Iowa/New Hampshire primaries are seldomly selected as Presidential candidates. That is what I was thinking, like these primaries actually mean anything. By the time the actual election takes place, the names from these primaries are dusty footnotes.
20
posted on
07/24/2006 3:17:54 PM PDT
by
LasVegasMac
(Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson